The Song Of Solomon Exposed!
Proof of just how far Liberals will go to destroy public morality and how the Concerned Majority must FIGHT BACK!
Liberals are a minority, but that doesn?t stop them spreading their disease just everywhere, eating up our country like a cancer on a lung. When I see Liberal filth like The Jon Stewart show and Fox News on our televisions every day, when I see Michael Moore in our nations? bookstores and in our cinemas, when I realise that Satan?s paper The New York Times is available in just about every town in our great land, I?m taken to the borders of despair. I?m brought back only by the love of Jesus Christ and the knowledge that none of this rubbish will make it to heaven. I?m also made stronger because of the realization that good patriots like Ann Coulter and our own Shelley, Tristan, Michael and Barbara are fighting back against this plague.
But the fight is hard and our enemy is as cunning as Stalin, Chairman Mao, Hitler, Hirohito and Bill Clinton combined. It is just amazing how low these Liberals will go to degrade the national discourse. Truly amazing. What I am going to say now will amaze and horrify all Christian Americans truly and I urge readers at this point to take a deep breath and prepare themselves for a terrible shock.
This is how low liberals have gone They have defiled the Holy Bible. I feel sick even typing it. The Holy Bible!
The Bible is perfect in every way. It’s authorship a divine miraculous mystery. Every word of the Bible is God’s own words. We know this because the Bible tells us so. And why would God ever lie about a thing like that? (That?s logic, Liberals, read it and weep!) The words of the Bible need not be interpreted they are direct and unambiguous orders from our Lord, unchanged forever.
It is all the knowledge you need in life. The only guide and staff that can ever matter. Real truth rather than the junk science faith of Godless liberals.
And that?s why liberals hate it and that?s why they?ve been running a centuries?-long campaign to discredit it.
?How have they done this?? I hear you ask.
The answer is so far beyond the pale of decency I barely know how to express it.
The Liberals have somehow managed to sneak a troll book into the Holy Book. That?s right! They?ve sneaked Satan?s words into the Word Of God. They have defiled the Bible.
I?m talking about the Song Of Solomon. This shameful ?poem? is included in all modern Bibles as if it is a book from the Old Testament, but The Song Of Solomon is not God?s word. The proof for this is simple and obvious. The Song Of Solomon is disgusting.
Christians may want to skip the next few paragraphs of filth, although I include only the lightest material from this hard-nasty-porn troll book.
If you do want to get an idea of the extent of the evil, read this:
Your twin breasts are like two fawns,
Twins of a gazelle,
Which feed among the lillies.”
And this:
I have taken off my robe,
How can I put it on again?”
And this:
?When I found the one I love.
I held him and would not let him go,
Until I had brought him to the house of my mother,
And into the chamber of her who conceived me.”
And worst of all, this:
How fair is your love,
My sister, my spouse!”
If this incitement to incest isn?t the Devil?s Work, I don?t know what is! (By the way, Liberal readers, before you get clever, I do know what the Devil?s work is and that?s why I?m a Republican not a Democ-rat).
This disgusting rubbish has clearly been placed in the Holy Of Holies by crypto-liberal-porn-trolls.
The question that has been troubling me is, how? To answer this I have had to do some serious historical research.
At first I wondered if, like most bad things, this book had been somehow created in the 1960s and slipped into the modern Bible by pot-smoking hippies, but reference to my grand-poppy?s family Bible soon dispelled that notion.
I won?t bore you with the details of the rest of my endeavors, suffice to say that I had to go further and further back in time, uncovering generations of Liberal deceit along the way. I was eventually faced with the horrible knowledge that for even longer than our Great Nation has been in existence, Liberals have been trying to corrupt public morality.
My search eventually took me back to the Fifteenth Century and to that den of vice that is Europe. There I discovered that a well-known pornographer called Caxton invented a (very unimpressive) printing press (which was naturally, nothing like as good as the ones we have in America now) in the year 1450 in England. He used this press to distribute filth like an utterly immoral book called ?The Canterbury Tales? and other such indecent works that seemed to delight his faggot Limey readership.
Caxton also began printing Bibles, which up until that point in time had been safely kept in the hands of Holy Monks and only written in Latin, since that was the language of God at the time and so that liberals would be unable to read it (since they were too stupid). Caxton, however, seized the opportunity. Because he was the first person who was going to widely distribute the Bible, he realized that this was his chance to corrupt it. He had to be subtle since he knew that if he wasn?t the monks would catch him out, so he just sneakily slipped the Song Of Solomon into an obscure part of the Old Testament (reasoning that only the best Christians read this part of the Bible and that since all the monks were tainted by being Europeans, not even they would bother).
By the time it was noticed that this Devil Book had been included in the Good Book, it was too late. It was hundreds of years later and Caxton and his cronies had printed so many copies of their version that they far outnumbered the originals. Rather than go through correcting their mistake and going to the expense and trouble of burning thousands of Bibles and creating new ones, the lazy Europeans decided on a cover up…
That?s right, they just tried to pretend that the Song Of Solomon had been in the Bible all along.
And so it was that this foul salacious porn-sex-filth was enabled to enter every decent American home.
But now, with the help of God, and ShelleyTheRepublican.com I understand that it is OUR MISSION as God-fearing Americans to finally remove this abomination. It?s God?s will.
Let me explain.
God controls everything, so it must have been Him who first enabled the Song Of Solomon to enter His book. Liberals are cunning, but they can?t deceive our Lord. It was his plan to let the book sneak in through Caxton?s printing presses.
Why would He do this?
To test us.
To test us in the same way as he sent his only son Jesus Christ down to earth to die and allowed crazed oral-sex-fiend Bill Clinton into the White House. After Jesus came true religion. After Bill Clinton came George W Bush. After we remove the Song Of Solomon, what blessings will God bestow on us?
I think the removal of that vile book may be the event that could even bring on The End Times and finally wipe the Liberal scourge from the earth.
I for one vote that we get out our scissors and see!
May God Bless You All,
Sam Johnston
Post Script
By coincidence good Christian STR supporter Richard 23 got in touch on my weblog and posted this link:
http://www.book22.com/merchant2/
That’s the kind of smut that the Song Of Solomon justifies. If that’s not taking God’s name in vain I don’t know what is. Thank you Richard, I am always most impressed by your diligence and simple, pure faith.
Image sources:
Caxton: http://www.hrc.utexas.edu/
The Bible: www.daily-bible.com (Wholly Holy!)
Sample page from the song of songs: http://www.yaronlivay.com
End Times: http://www.wga.hu
70 Comments so far
Leave a reply
Oh you’ve seen right! At my goth time, we use this text in our satanic ritual, before having liberal relationship with the body of the sacrified… I am ashamed of that period of my life.
Hopefully, in my new born life now, I tears those pagess from my Holy Book and burn them. I’ll never give a look at those pages again. Please, help me, and don’t post anymore of the sort, it make me sick.
I am truly convinced of the satire of the site when its stated that Fox News is liberal filth and in the next paragraph praise Ann Coltier because I have seen the insane ramblings of her on her editorials ON FOX NEWS! she has been on Fox news for sometime. So has every so called Conservative journalist since its inception. In the face of blatant errors in information i see what this site is and what its tried to hide.
Oh, you have GOT to be kidding me? You mean to tell me that you have never read the Bible enough to know that Song of Soloman existed and what it contained? Give me a break! I thought you claimed to be Christians! Obviously you aren’t if you haven’t bothered to read the Holy Word.
Richard, dear, as a republican born-and-bred, I feel it is my duty to help you understand a few things. One, the Song of Solomon is not an incestual text written for some whore. It was originally meant to show good Christian men and women how a married sex life should be. Solomon refers to his wife as his “sister” meaning “sister-in-Christ”. I am as happy as the next conservative to undermine liberal conspiracies, but only if I am truly informed first. Attacking by way of ignorance will only backfire on us all. And I am appalled at you, Richard, for posting such a lewd portrait of the miraculous Second Coming! The End Times will indeed be a lovely and very much welcome time, but I for one do not want to see all that nudity abounding in front of me or my Christian children! Please, find a more suitable, clothed picture to express your joy. Thank you, Richard.
M. Hatcher
http://shelleyuncovered.com
http://shelleyuncovered.blogspot.com
“The Bible is perfect in every way. It?¢‚Ǩ?°?É‚Äû?ɬ¥s authorship a divine miraculous mystery. Every word of the Bible is God?¢‚Ǩ?°?É‚Äû?ɬ¥s own words. We know this because the Bible tells us so. And why would God ever lie about a thing like that? (That?¢‚Ǩ?°?É‚Äû?ɬ¥s logic, Liberals, read it and weep!)”
No, That was a question…
And to be more “logical” The bible is a translation of Gods words. I thought that was common knowledge…
Now dont misunderstand me (i know it will be hard), the general meaning as a whole is probably close to the original. But to take the whole things WORD FOR WORD is absurd… (pardon the rhyme)
Im not going into the possibilities with you about rulers (english or roman) who changed certain things (which may or may not have made a huge difference, we dont know…) in the bible…
I forgot to mention:
“There I discovered that a well-known pornographer called Caxton invented a (very unimpressive) printing press (which was naturally, nothing like as good as the ones we have in America now) in the year 1450 in England”
The first computers took up whole basements, were they very unimpressive? Is the first step of a child any less meaningful than a race that said child might run in later, just because it wasnt as big?
dont speak of logic then spit out this…
“But the fight is hard and our enemy is as cunning as Stalin, Chairman Mao, Hitler, Hirohito and Bill Clinton combined.”
Never been a fan of Clinton myself, but seeing him in the same sentence as Stalin and Hitler sort of makes me cringe.
“There I discovered that a well-known pornographer called Caxton invented a (very unimpressive) printing press (which was naturally, nothing like as good as the ones we have in America now)”
Yes, except for the small fact that if that very unimpressive European printing press hadn’t been invented, your good American presses now WOULDN’T EVEN EXIST. Besides, it’s not that good printing presses are exclusive to America. We have perfectly good printing presses here in Italy as well.
(I am also deeply amused to see one of the most important works in the English language, the ‘Canterbury Tales’, referred to as filth. But I guess you people are strongly opposed to culture.)
“The Bible is perfect in every way. It?¢‚Ǩ?°?É‚Äû?ɬ¥s authorship a divine miraculous mystery. Every word of the Bible is God?¢‚Ǩ?°?É‚Äû?ɬ¥s own words. We know this because the Bible tells us so. And why would God ever lie about a thing like that? (That?¢‚Ǩ?°?É‚Äû?ɬ¥s logic, Liberals, read it and weep!)”
Of course it’s logic! It is a very good example of CIRCULAR logic. I fail to be impressed.
We love you “The Spur”! Now you’ve got your share of love, go play on your boring blog full of trolls and stop spamming here, you are boring.
Fox news is liberal?!
OMG, Sam, I knew this article was coming. You told me in advance but now that’s it’s here I can only praise the baby Jesus who is obviously speaking though you. I had to stop at this point and comment:
Sam: “‘How have they done this?’ I hear you ask.”
Wow, just wow. How did you know? I was mouthing the words when I came upon this declaration. It gave me shivers!
I will keep reading now but this incredible expose is blowing me away. It’s as if the Lord our God was using you as a vessel of truth.
You’ve done it again, Sam. God bless you! God bless STR.com. And God bless America!
Whenever I’ve read the Song of Solomon I’ve thought of Linda Lovelace in the filty porn film Deep Throat turning on the Nixon Administration.
The fact that Caxton slipped the Song of Solomon into the Holy Bible is something you’ll never hear in the MSM. Thank you Sam!
And thank you for giving me credit in your wonderful article. Although in all honesty I had nothing to do with it. God was posting through me. God has blessed you with the gift of Truth.
You can be sure, I already have scisors in hand and will correct the blasphemy in my local church. I trust that others will do the same!
As long as we’re editing the bible, are you going to clip the part out of Genisis about Lot’s daughters getting their father drunk and sleeping with him to bear illigitimate children?
“One day the older daughter said to her sister, “There isn?¢‚Ǩ?°?É‚Äû?ɬ¥t a man anywhere in this entire area for us to marry. And our father will soon be too old to have children. Come, let?¢‚Ǩ?°?É‚Äû?ɬ¥s get him drunk with wine, and then we will sleep with him. That way we will preserve our family line through our father.” So that night they got him drunk, and the older daughter went in and slept with her father. He was unaware of her lying down or getting up again.
“The next morning the older daughter said to her younger sister, “I slept with our father last night. Let?¢‚Ǩ?°?É‚Äû?ɬ¥s get him drunk with wine again tonight, and you go in and sleep with him. That way our family line will be preserved.” So that night they got him drunk again, and the younger daughter went in and slept with him. As before, he was unaware of her lying down or getting up again. So both of Lot?¢‚Ǩ?°?É‚Äû?ɬ¥s daughters became pregnant by their father.” (Genesis 19:23-25, 30-36 , NLT)
Fool. Liberals (Which is the whole world except Texas in your definition) pretty much didn’t exist when that poem was written. You are attacking your own Bible saying it’s been corrupted. Not even the Bible is right-wing enough for you. I pity you. Trying to understand that text when you just can’t see it’s symbolic.
This is what I think of you right now:
http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/youare.php
You’re so good christians that you even want to change the bible to suit your belief? Now that’s dedication to religion!
(To all those who can’t read between the lines, the comment was sarcasm. S-A-R-C-A-S-M, it’s not so difficult to spell, you should try it sometimes.)
The bible is god’s word because the bible tells you so? You may want to look up http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Begging_the_question
or http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circular_definition
x-D
@ A Nice Hacker 2; Just because Ann Coulter appears on Fox that doesn’t stop it being Liberal nonsense. Why else would they show so much ‘news’ desgined to make Our President look stupid? She is an oasis of sanity and faith in that devil desert. She appears on it as it’s the compromise she has to make to get her message out, just like Shelley used to on the evil podcast network.
@16 Bob the builder, that’s just the kind of reasoned argument I’d expect from a liberal.
@ 17 And did you not read the article,Tuomas? The Bible has already been chaned by an English pervert. I want to purify it.
@ 3. Jason Corfman, of course I knew of the Song Of Solomon… it’s just that it has taken years of diligent research to uncover its true history.
@12-13 Richard 23, you truly are a true man of God. Your words are a light in darkness. thank you.
what is all this mumbo-jumbo-chitter-chatter? Why are those titties censored.. ..again?!
And on a more serious note: would have been nice, if somebody’s parents had given themselves to Christ (and Christ alone!) and not to each other…….
Sam Johnston (20), you are also a light in the darkness of the interweb, praise be upon you. You fill up my senses, like a night in the forest, john denver sang that, and they never found his head, let that be a lesson to all unbeleivers, heads will roll.
“[William] Caxton invented a (very unimpressive) printing press (which was naturally, nothing like as good as the ones we have in America now) in the year 1450 in England.”
Well, naturally. But a modern press would have difficulty ruuning in 1450 due to the lack of a little thing called electricty, so Caxton’s got one over you there…
By the way I have never come across an American manufactured printing press [in the UK], which makes me doubt their superiority/existance. If they were any good we’d probably be using them instead of the German and Japanese presses I am familiar with.
I realise this is all a wind up, but my sence of pedantry just wouldn’t let me let it lie…
Ok, yeah… \”It was originally meant to show good Christian men and women how a married sex life should be. Solomon refers to his wife as his ?¢‚Ǩ?°?É‚Äû?ɬ?sister?¢‚Ǩ?°?É‚Äû?ɬ? meaning ?¢‚Ǩ?°?É‚Äû?ɬ?sister-in-Christ?¢‚Ǩ?°?É‚Äû?ɬ?.\” - For one thing the Song of Solomon was written hundreds of years before the birth of Christ, so how could it show anyone how to be a good \”Christian\” anything!?
Literal mindedness rears its ugly head again! –And speaking of books you would like taken out of the Bible: the book of Revelation was originally viewed a non-canon by early church founders… but look how you have taken the idea of the Rapture to heart, Sam. You contradict yourself (over and over)! You say \”The Bible is perfect in every way. It?¢‚Ǩ?°?É‚Äû?ɬ¥s authorship a divine miraculous mystery.\” but then you pick and choose what books and verses contradict your sheltered, repressed & literal minded life. You\’re too feeble minded to be allowed to present a blog to be taken seriously.
hmmmm… way to cut up and edit my post… just like you’d like to cut up the bible, eh? You and Thomas Jefferson would have agreed on a few matters… He liked cutting out the parts in the Bible which spoke of Jesus’ divinity. Although, I’m sure you’d just add that type of thing in…
Sam Johnston,
you are a wonderful Christian. God bless you!
Shelley
ah Sam how you never pay attention Fox News is a conservative media outlet. You havent seen Fox news if you dont know that.
richard 23:
“Whenever I?¢‚Ǩ?°?É‚Äû?ɬ¥ve read the Song of Solomon I?¢‚Ǩ?°?É‚Äû?ɬ¥ve thought of Linda Lovelace in the filty porn film Deep Throat turning on the Nixon Administration.”
do you not know history? The porn movie and the actress have nothing to do with the downfall of Nixon. Woodward and Burns who reported on the story of watergate called thier source, who we found out last year was a chief FBI agent, deepthroat after the movie. that is the only connection.
The reason everyone thinks this site is satire, which it is, is because of the blatantly wrong information.
Gosh I found this article interesting. You know, I’ve often wondered about Book 22 myself, but whenever I’ve asked my Pastor he’s just told me that God moves in mysterious ways and ours is not to question. I can’t wait to tell him it’s not God at all, but some horrible conspiracy. I can’t believe the lengths these criminals have gone too! It’s crazier than the Da Vinci Code… but all the more awful because it’s obviously true. I even read a bit of a translation of the Canterbury Tales after reading this article and I must say it’s one of the most disgusting things I’ve seen. And how foul that Liberals insist on teaching it at College. perhaps you should write about that Mr Johnston. i sure would join any campaign you start to get rid of such filth.
I’m going to see my pastor now, I’m sure he’ll be astounded! I’ll report back if I make good progress. God bless you!
George Watts
Feeling Shelleywinked, go to: http://www.nomorestr.blogspot.com/
Hacker, I suppose you mean Woodward and Bernstein. And that FBI “agent” was Willy Mark Felt, a porn actor name if ever I heard one.
Refreshing to see how you blew that one. Bet that “Burns.” Hahahaha!
“The Bible is perfect in every way. It?¢‚Ǩ?°?É‚Äû?ɬ¥s authorship a divine miraculous mystery. Every word of the Bible is God?¢‚Ǩ?°?É‚Äû?ɬ¥s own words. We know this because the Bible tells us so.” isnt this known as a self reinforcing dillusion?
Well sorry but you did state it was Linda Lovelace that turned on Nixon. just pointing out your stupidity!
wanna see how bush really works?
look here!
http://www.verficktescheisse.com/bush-pilot-with-english-subtitles/
I cannot believe what I’m reading… are you serious? Your own rights (yeah, those that you enjoy nowadays) were won with the blood of freedom-thinking people. By the way, “liberalism” and “neoliberalism” is the current form of our political and ecomonical system. If you try to think about History, Adam Smith wrote about the first “liberalism”, which is the way Capitalism works, even in your beloved country. You should read in a dictionary before you write anything in your blog.
Oh, before I forget. A true christan does NEVER stand for ANY country. We’re ALL human beings, ok? It doesn’t matter if you’re from Europe, Japan, Congo or anywhere else. People usually get what they want (their own interest) from the Bible or any holy book (or idea). This world is not made by countries; it’s made by it’s people. Don’t forget that Jesus Christ fought against an empire like the USA. You people are completely cracked and think you are the only good people in the world. Well then, you’re wrong. Don’t forget the past, and don’t forget that every empire comes to an end. Oh, and I hope God forgives you.
Between you and bill clinton, i wouldn’t bet HE would be nearer to hitler than you… He didn’t believed in the “white people supremacy” when you’re trusting WASP ideologies over the rest of the world :/ YOU are the new nazis.
@Richard23: Read up again: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W._Mark_Felt
Porn actor, now that’s a funny way to describe it…
@”Concerned American”: I would like to hear your pastors response. After he stopped laughing…
Blasphemers. I?¢‚Ǩ?°?É‚Äû?ɬ¥ll see you in hell. You?¢‚Ǩ?°?É‚Äû?ɬ¥ll enjoy it, I make nice cheese butties.
29. 8for8: another jack ass in quest of attention! It is even more boring than The Spur! Go STR, wack them down!
@20 - Sam, you’re saying it took you “years” to conduct an inccomplete 5-minute internet search and only traced the history of the text back 500 years? I don’t think so. I think you just happened to accidentally stumble upon one of those verses the other day and suddenly decided that you didn’t want them in your Bible, so you made up some stuff about it (in other words, in case that isn’t clear enough for you, I think you lied about the Holy Bible).
BTW, the Song of Solomon has been a part of the official Hebrew Bible, or “Tanakh”, since at least 200 BC (although there is some question as to just how old Song of Solomon is… some say the tenth century BC, some say the third century BC, some say somewhere in between). Regardless, it was an accepted book by 200 BC. And in case you are wondering what the significance of that is and why I am bringing up a Jewish book (because I know that you, like the Nazis, hate Jews), the Tanakh is the same as the Christian Old Testament.
So you are only off by 1700 years (minimum). So much for your “years of research”.
I guess this means that liberals were trying to bring down Christianity 200 years before Christ was even born. Man, those liberals are a sneaky bunch, aren’t they? (This last paragraph is sarcasm, btw.)
thank you people! i’ve read this yesterday and suddenly felt to tired to make a decent response to this piece of desinfo??ÉÀúc crap
Jason I feel so ashamed for you. Why do you have to defend this pornographic nonsense?
8for8 and the Spur: I just wished you were sued for the lies you are telling on your blogs! Stop spreading hate.
Jason Corfman, your comments would make the baby Jesus weep. How do you know of my research? Just because you get ll your facts from liberal-lie-library wikipedia that doesn’t mean real scholars can’t do some proper first hand textual investigations. How do you know the Song Of Solomon has been part of the so-called Tankh for all that time? because you were told so by lying liberal educators! Well, i did my own research and as you’ve now read the discoveries were astounding. Just becuase you don’t like them, doesn’t mean they aren’t true. Now stop making God angry and get out your scissors.
You are absolutely right, Sam. I don’t know about your research… all I have is your word that you even did your research. So, where are your sources? Or do you expect me to just take your word that the Holy Bible is wrong and that Christians (and Jews) have been duped for over 500 years and you are the only person to notice it?
BTW, I won’t ask for yours without giving you some of mine (just a small sample, mind you).
http://www.allaboutthejourney.org/history-of-the-bible.htm
http://www.religion-cults.com/Judaism/escript.htm
http://www.reference.com/browse/wiki/Bible
http://www.reference.com/browse/wiki/Dating_the_Bible
But here is one interesting thing… the complete Tanakh (except for the book of Esther, which isn’t in dispute here) was found in the Dead Sea Scrolls, which dates back to before Christ.
If you want more, I will be happy to further retrace my search. This is just a small sampling found in just a few minutes. (And notice, not a single one of them includes Wikipedia.)
And please, don’t dismiss my sources until and unless you provide your own. They don’t have to be online sources… I know how to use a library… I just want sources. And no, Shelley, Tristan, Swip, or Richard 23, nor anyone else who writes for this site do not count as sources.
And Swip, I defend this because it is the Word of God. If you have a problem with that, then you are in the wrong religion. The Bible is not meant for you to follow the parts that you agree with and discard the parts you don’t. Take it as a whole, or dismiss it as a whole. Don’t chop it up into little pieces on a whim.
there are many references on solomon song on Tanakh and so little (none) on Caxton reviewing the bible…
so… who’s right ?
an example (not wikipedia)
http://www.sacred-texts.com/bib/vul/sol.htm
what about encarta ? there are many references but my subscription has just expired.
This time I put my bet on Jason.
sorry, just got to remind you that you’re incorrect. Song of Songs has been in there whole lot longer than you claim. This is just the problem with you believing that the Bible is as easy to understand and gain information from as A fast Food Menu.
Jesus himself said that much of the Bible is allegory. Remember the part where he says that Jonah was a ressurrection story? 3 days in the belley of the beast? No, you were far too caught up in looking for parts that said Europe is full of nazis (I’d give up now)
THE BIBLE WAS WRITEN IN GREEK NOT LATIN YOU STUPID PRICK!!!!!!!!
I would like to congratulate you for uncovering this liberal conspiricy. I must admit I was not even aware of it until you brought it to my attention. But now it all makes sense, the Word of God could never contain such filth, and it sounds just like liberals to do something like this. And some people have been saying Fox News isn’t liberal. You are wrong, do you ever hear them take a moral stand on vital moral issues like stem-cell research or tax-relief? No, all they want to talk about is some African kid who has AIDS because his mother’s a whore. It makes me sick. All they talked about a few months ago was how evil Tom Delay is. A man with finer moral structure you will never find. And yet as the liberal attack dog that is Fox News, they did things like call him a criminal and then talk about how Hilary Clinton is upstanding and would make a wonderful president. Yeah I really want a woman on her period to have her finger a foot away from the doomsday button. Fox News is liberal they just aren’t quite as big of pinkos as CNN.
@Office_tramp (23):
Have you ever smelled the scents of pedantry?
@46 Actually, most of the Old Testament was written in Hebrew. And watch your language.
Hey, Sam… are you going to come up with any of your alleged sources from your alleged multi-year alleged research project? I can come up with more of my own if you want.
Dear Jason,
i suggest you start by gettin hold of a copy of Jacobus Magni’s fascinating ‘domus regularium bonorum puerorum’. Then look in Caxton’s own disgusting work: The History of Reynard The Foxe,’ in which he gives sundry demonstrations of his true nature.
Evil Pope Pius II’s Epistolae Familiares carry many confessions of the cover up of which I speak. look also at the dirty book: ‘Legenda aurea sanctorum sive Lombrdica historia. Historiae plurimorum sanctorum’ by Jacobus de Voragine. You will be astounded by what you read.
When you have finished those, report back to me and we’ll get down to some serious discussion rather than relying on your false-Christian lying websites.
Wow, I’m impressed… you actually responded. I will look into your sources and get back with you.
BTW, I don’t see what “The History of Reynard The Foxe”, which is a series of fictional stories that happened to be reprinted by Caxton (who was, as you pointed out in your first post, a printer), has to do with the Song of Solomon being inserted into the Bible with nobody noticing, but I will check it out, nonetheless, along with your other sources.
Thank you Jason,
It’s the subtexts and evil Liberal code language of deceit you have to look for…
to iamrepublican:
I’m afraid when salomon said “my sister” he meant exactly that “His Sister”. Who did you come up with that sister in christ crap?
Salomon was not a christian, he never heard of christ, he lived centuries before him.
I’ll ask again…. what does that have to do with the Song of Solomon?
BTW, I assume you mean for me to look at Jacobus Magni’s “Sophologium” which was given to ‘Domus Regularium Bonorum puerorum’at Liege in 1474.
Hmmm… so far we have a series of fictional stories that have absolutely nothing to do with Song of Solomon, and we have a work incorrectly referenced. Oh, yeah, I’m feeling good about this research project.
I’m almost surprised to see that Pope Pius II really did write a “Epistolae Familiares”, although I haven’t found out what is in it yet (give me time). Same goes for Jacobus de Voragine’s “Legendae sanctorum”.
Maybe I am going about this the wrong way…
You quoted the NIV Bible in another post. This is taken from the Preface in the NIV, which is talking about how they came up with this particular translation for the Bible:
“For the Old Testament the standard Hebrew text, the Masoretic Text as published in the latest editions of Biblia Hebraica, was used throughout. The Dead Sea Scrolls contain material bearing on an earlier stage of Hebrew text. They were consulted, as were the Samaritan Pentateuch and the ancient scribal traditions relating to textual changes…. The translators also consulted the more important early versions - the Septuagint; Aquila, Symmachus and Theodotion; the Vulgate; the Syriac Peshitta; the Targums; and for the Psalms the Juxta Hebraica of Jerome. ”
This Preface can be found at the front pages of any version of the NIV Bible. BTW, the Masoretic Text dates back to the Ninth Century. I have a hard time believing that a book that wasn’t written until the 15th century would be found in the source text used for the NIV that dates back to the ninth century.
Volume 2 of the “Legenda Aurea” by Jacobus de Voragine has this to say:
“He (Solomon) made the book of the parables containing thirty-one chapters, the book of the Canticles, the book of Ecclesiastes, containing twelve chapters, and the book of Sapience containing nineteen chapters.”
I’m sure in your years of research you discovered that the Canticles refers to the Song of Solomon.
The “book of the parables containing thirty-one chapters” refers, of course, to Proverbs, which has 31 chapters. The “book of Ecclesiastes” should be fairly obvious. The “book of Sapience” refers to “The Book of Wisdom” which is included in the Catholic Bible.
That isn’t the only mention of the Canticles in the “Legenda Aurea”, however. Also in Volume 2:
“And this may suffice you for this present, for the church will also ordain the feasts which follow the nativity of Jesu Christ, for two causes. The first is to Jesu Christ which is head and spouse, to the end that the accompanies be joined to him, for Jesu Christ spouse of the church in this world adjoineth to him three companies, of which companies is said in the Canticles: My white soul and ruddy, chosen of thousands. The white is as to S. John the Evangelist, a precious confessor, and the ruddy or red is as to S. Stephen the first martyr, and chosen of thousands, is to the virginal S John company of the innocents.”
And in Volume 1:
“Whereof Jesu Christ saith: I am come to cast fire in the earth, but this is that burneth and inflameth the hearts. And is compared to wind which is hot, whereof is said in the Canticles: Veni auster et perfla hortum meum. Come wind of the south, and blow in my garden, that is my soul.”
And Volume 5:
“And after the passion the cross was much enhanced, for the vilety was transported into preciousness. Of the which the blessed S. Andrew saith: O precious Holy Cross, God saw thee. His barrenness was turned into fruit, as it is said in the Canticles: I shall ascend up into palm tree, et cetera.”
“Of these three things saith Bernard upon the Canticles. The angel seeketh moyen between the love and the lover in offering the desires and bringing gifts, and moveth her and pleaseth him.”
So, where exactly do I find evidence in this that the Song of Solomon is false?
BTW, obviously I haven’t had time to read all seven volumes of the Legenda Aurea yet, but I do plan on reading them. They look fascinating. Thanks for pointing it out to me. However, they seem worthless in proving your point.
BTW, this was written 200 years before Caxton translated it into English and printed it (written 1260, printed by Caxton in 1483).
Jason Corfman,
Your lack of understanding astounds me! Can you not read the words that are in front of you and draw proper conclusions from them? I have no idea why you involve yourself with politics when your reasoning is so deeply flawed!
Jacobus de Voragine said Solomon wrote that the book of Canticles (Song of Solomon). What about that am I not understanding? It seems pretty straight-forward to me. And after reading Volume 1 of his writings, he did a very good job summarizing the Bible (and it doesn’t look “dirty” at all). I haven’t gotten to reading Volume 2 yet, but I haven’t found any factual errors yet.
Add to that the fact that Jacobus de Voragine lived 200 years before Caxton, who you accused of writing the Song of Solomon.
It all seems pretty straight-forward and easy to understand; based on the sources you have shown me, there is no proof that Caxton did write or insert Song of Solomon into the Bible, nor is there any proof that Song of Solomon hasn’t always been part of the Christian Bible (quite the contrary, actually). So you tell me… what am I missing? Because so far from what I can tell based on your own “sources”, you are dead wrong, and it appears you are leading me on a wild goose chase.
lol internets
http://lolinternets2.ytmnd.com/
http://biblevideo.ytmnd.com/
The bible is not suitable for children.
Any one that takes one line from the scriptures should be stoned as a heretic.
The marriage bed cannot be defiled, and what you want to take away from the Holy Scriptures is what a sensual Man/Wife relationship could be. GOD Almighty created sex-not you nor your quasi Puritanical view of what is allowed in the marriage bed.
Catholics should be ashamed of themselves for denying the clergy to be married-as the Holy Scriptures DEMANDS, what part of the Revelation did you miss-a church of un married clergy is ANTI-CHRIST and is an APOTSTATE religion.
Sodomy is a Homosexual MAN/MAN relationship and is an abomination before a Holy God. To call my wife “sister” is not incests-in this world we as children of the most high are indeed brothers and sisters in Christ, redeemed and adopted into his house. As the JEWS are a chosen-remeber this is old Testament.
Read a little more of the song and you will find ORAL sex, and it is not SODOMY-just because some Catholic calls it Sodomy does not make it so. Sodomy defined is Homosexual relations. The Song of Solomon is a Bride-Groom relationship.
Do not take parts of the Bible out of context, because you can be accused of heresy-and should be stoned outside the city walls-do you want all of the law or just what you see! Do you want to take scripture out that seemingly contradicts with other scriptures? No may GOD forbid you to do that-do not read into the scripture your own perversion and misinterpretation.
This book and all that it contains belongs in the Bible, and thank the Most High GOD! for the marriage bed!
@ Mike
Literal mindedness rears its ugly head again! ?¢‚Ǩ?°?É‚Äû?ɬ¨And speaking of books you would like taken out of the Bible: the book of Revelation was originally viewed a non-canon by early church founders?¢‚Ǩ?°?É‚Äû?Ǭ? but look how you have taken the idea of the Rapture to heart, Sam. You contradict yourself (over and over)! You say \?¢‚Ǩ?°?É‚Äû?ɬ?The Bible is perfect in every way. It?¢‚Ǩ?°?É‚Äû?ɬ¥s authorship a divine miraculous mystery.\?¢‚Ǩ?°?É‚Äû?ɬ? but then you pick and choose what books and verses contradict your sheltered, repressed & literal minded life. You\?¢‚Ǩ?°?É‚Äû?ɬ¥re too feeble minded to be allowed to present a blog to be taken seriously.
@MethatIam
Do not take parts of the Bible out of context, because you can be accused of heresy-and should be stoned outside the city walls-do you want all of the law or just what you see! Do you want to take scripture out that seemingly contradicts with other scriptures? No may GOD forbid you to do that-do not read into the scripture your own perversion and misinterpretation.
This book and all that it contains belongs in the Bible, and thank the Most High GOD! for the marriage bed!
Very good points….
Shelley and her fellow heretics have commited blasphemy over and over again….I think it?Ǭ¨?Ǭ•s time for somebody to take legal action against this website…
Shelley… 2 centuries ago you and your “claime to be Christians” would have been burned, for deliberaly twisting the sacred words of our LORD
Who cares whether Solomon meant sister in christ or real sister? According to the bible, the race of man was propogated by incest not once, but twice. Adam and Eve, as well as Noah.
Who were their children having sex with? Each other. There was no one else.
The bible also states to “love thy neighbor”. Nowhere does it say love thy “christian” neighbor.
And I have to say you have been one of the worst examples of ignorance and racism hiding behind a mask of intelligece I have come across in quite some time.
To call yourself “christian” is tantamount to spitting in the face of God. I’m sure there is a special level in hell reserved just for you.
To the last few commenters: Is satire really so difficult to recognize?
I only had to briefly skim through that pile of cack to realise that you obviously have too much time on your hands! :D
If you spent less time condemning and criticising people’s lifestyles with your tunnel-like and close minded vision, you’d probably realise people aren’t actually that bad .. just calm down and if you really want to do God’s word, try and be nice to people .. don’t “cure” them, just be nice.
And I think you better get your facts right before you blog. No one listens to a liar. Most of the “facts” you posted have no basis in reality. I like the one “gay parents will make their kids gay.”.
Right…… :\
I imagine you were that kid at school that didn’t really fit in .. and now you’re getting your own back by condemning people. Well get this, they don’t care. Everyone’s a sinner baby! ;]
xx
shelley says sam johnston is a wonderful christian haha? bullshit like hell he’s a wonderful christian.
FUCKING FUNNY
FUCK THE RAPTURE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!