Science: Why is it run like Saddam’s dictatorship?
Just what is the problem with Science today? We are told that Science’s job is to discover the details of God’s creation and help invent great products for the American consumer, but what about Abortion, Neo-Darwinism and the absurdly false “Big Bang Cosmology” - just how do these theories benefit mankind when they explicitly contradict Biblical Truth? Nothing good can come from ideas that distract people from God’s message.
Today many Americans are realizing that the elite institutions which decide what does or does not constitute science are run along more similar lines to Saddam Hussein’s Islamofascist dictatorship than a modern democratic society.
Scientists claim that they have a process called “peer-review” which helps them decide what is true and what is not. A peer-review board consists of a group of self-appointed experts organized along similar lines to a Soviet era polit-bureau. It is their job to approve “science” that complies with the political goals of their ultra-leftist ideological masters.
Most critics agree that Science is going badly wrong. It’s original mission has become perverted and now it seeks only to challenge God, or worse attempt to disprove God’s very existence. Why has the science community deserted Jesus Christ, the founder of modern rational thought, and the very basis of all that is good in Science? The simple answer is because there is an evil atheist conspiracy which aims to exclude mainstream Christian viewpoints from the scientific process.
Don’t just take my word for it - consider these observations by the English atheist and God-hater, Richard Dawkins. He writes that a ?? systematic study by Benjamin Beit-Hallahmi ?found that among Nobel Prize laureates in the sciences, as well as those in literature, there was a remarkable degree of irreligiosity, as compared to the populations they came from?.?
He continues, ?A study in the leading journal Nature by Larson and Witham in 1998 showed that of those American scientists considered eminent enough by their peers to have been elected to the National Academy of Sciences (equivalent to being a Fellow of the Royal Society in Britain) only about 7 per cent believe in a personal God. This overwhelming preponderance of atheists is almost the exact opposite of the profile of the American population at large, of whom more than 90 per cent are believers in some sort of supernatural being.?
STR Fact File: Who is Richard Dawkins? Richard Dawkins is a former Oxford University (England) professor. He was fired because the University rules require all staff to be Christian, however Dawkins is still well known for his hatred of God. Dawkins initially rose to notoriety when he published his 1960’s science freak-out called “The Selfish Gene” which postulates that man’s sinful nature is unavoidable because we all poses a gene for selfishness. Most Christians dispute this theory because the Bible says that Christ died to save us from all of our sins, including selfishness.
Even scientists admit that they no longer reflect the society which provides their funding. Science has become a completely undemocratic process, out of touch with America. As a result, it is producing biased results which are easily disproved by anybody with a basic knowledge of the Bible.
If any other public sector area was seen to be so biased there would be national outrage. Could you imagine if the White-House or Justice department refused to hire Christians? If the National Acadamy of Sciences truly reflected America’s needs then it would need to be 90% Christian. Scientists should not be allowed to discriminate against the majority of Americans.
Fortunately, this is something our Republican administration have been working at reforming. George W. Bush has been personally appointing experts in both Science and Christianity to important scientific roles. These officers can ensure that our scientific institutions put out a more moderate message, rather than the exclusively secular message promoted by the Democratic party. As ever, liberals have tried to frustrate our good work.
Last year the liberal science community claimed to be outraged when they discovered that young Republican George Deutch had been advising Nasa on alternatives to the Big Bang theory. But what is so wrong with that? Scientists should be prepared to consider the possibility that the Big Bang theory is wrong. Why cant science be open-minded? Do scientists believe themselves to be smarter than God… apparently so.
We can count a number of victories. For example, a recent publication by the Discovery Institute can be found in all gift shops near the Grand-Canyon. Many liberals believe that the Grand-Canyon was formed by a process oferosion which took place over many millions of years. This is a truly absurd theory as the Bible confirms that the Earth is much younger than the junk-science Geologists require the earth to be. The discovery publication shows how the Canyon was formed during Noah’s flood and provides all the relevant scriptural quotations to back up this important scientific theory.
Liberals planned to “harvest” our pre-born children to make stem-cells, a new biological horror which promises to deliver genetic horrors like the image above. The Republican party has been the the biggest political opponent to self-interested stem cell researchers.
Liberals object to any fair and balanced approach which teaches both sides of debates like that which rages around the origins of the Grand Canyon, however we Republicans are committed to restoring Democracy and common-sense to the scientific process. What could be better for science than for it to accept universally acknowledged Biblical truths?
Yours in Christ,
Tristan J. Shuddery
30 Comments so far
Leave a reply
“”Many liberals believe that the Grand-Canyon was formed by a process oferosion which took place over many millions of years. This is a truly absurd theory as the Bible confirms that the Earth is much younger than the junk-science Geologists require the earth to be.”"
Humans wrote the bible, therefore they can write it wrong. Human fallacy is just one assumption. Assuming the world is only 4000 years old requires many other assumptions. Okam’s razor dictates that the bible is written wrong.
I know that lying is second nature to STR, but Richard is still a professor at Oxford, which does not require staff to be Christian.
When you talk such obvious rubbish, it makes EVERYTHING you say look ridiculous. The rest of your article is childish and beneath contempt, virtually fact-free. If your ludicrous assertions on the age of the earth were true, how could you explain the Neanderthals? The would have been widely seen and documented. Ditto any other extinct species.
With your disdain for science, please stay true to your beliefs and eschew any medical services when you are ill.
Your pool “What is the single greatest threat facing the United States?” is not exhaustive. You should ask one answer : “STR and equivalents”.
It would be quite fun to see how much vote it gets :-)
Are you friends with “Richard’? Christoph. Why not get him to post on here? Or is he too afraid of the ‘peer review’ he’ll get from Jesus Christ?
Red Flag, you aren’t a republican at all. I knew all along that you were a troll. It’s ridiculous to vote republican and not believe every word of the bible. Surely you must hate everything that George Bush and his party stands for. Shame on you!
This overwhelming preponderance of atheists is almost the exact opposite of the profile of the American population at large, of whom more than 90 per cent are believers in some sort of supernatural being.?¢‚Ǩ?°?É‚Äû?ɬ?
Don’t you think that is why they are smarter than the average, more open-minded than the average?
Scientists should not be allowed to discriminate against the majority of Americans.
It’s your own fault: Get educated, vote for a better school-system and stop being so stuck to 2000-year-old ideas..
to ?¢‚Ǩ?°?É‚Äû?ɬ?harvest?¢‚Ǩ?°?É‚Äû?ɬ? our pre-born children to make stem-cells
These pre-born bunches of cells are stem-cells. The whole problem exactly is, that no one is able to “make” stem-cells..
Just a quick question: How do you explain earth-quakes?
Cheers
Funny thing about Dawkins is that he holds the “Charles Simonyi”-chair at Oxford, founded by an important Microsoft employee, who, like Microsoft-founder Bill Gates, is an atheist. I still wonder why STR.com worships a company who’s leading figures are mostly atheists xD
[comments edited for being in an unAmerican language, hateful to jesus]
Stop right there!
Richard Dawkins is a former Oxford University (England) professor. He was sacked because the University rules require all staff to be Christian
I know from personnal experience that this is not true. My dad is a fellow of St. Cross college. He teaches there and has done for the best part of ten years. Last night he recieved an award for doing so. He is an atheist.
So now listen to Christopher:
I know that lying is second nature to STR, but Richard is still a professor at Oxford, which does not require staff to be Christian.
I’ve noticed that throughout the article, you refer to science and scientists as if they were a part of the government. Trust me, a lot of them are not, and nullifying that rather integral point rather destroys your argument somewhat.
> Nothing good can come from ideas that distract people from God?¢‚Ǩ?°?É‚Äû?ɬ¥s message.
Like automobiles, electricity or medicine?
“[comments edited for being in an unAmerican language, hateful to jesus]”
Did you know jesus didnt speak American, he spoke the same language as the so called “Towel-heads”
?¢‚Ǩ?°?É‚Äû?ɬ?Many liberals believe that the Grand-Canyon was formed by a process oferosion which took place over many millions of years. This is a truly absurd theory as the Bible confirms that the Earth is much younger than the junk-science Geologists require the earth to be.?¢‚Ǩ?°?É‚Äû?ɬ?
Then how were the Grand Canyon formed? explain that to me
[comments edited for being in an unAmerican language, hateful to jesus] Mr.X
“The discovery publication shows how the Canyon was formed during Noah?¢‚Ǩ?°?É‚Äû?ɬ¥s flood and provides all the relevant scriptural quotations to back up this important scientific theory.”
Sorry didnt see that, even if it is the stupidest thing i’ve ever hears. Luckily i don’t believe in a bloody thing that’s written in the bible
[comments edited for being in an unAmerican language, hateful to jesus] Mr.X
I hate Shelley-the-dumb-cunt republican and her scheming cock- sucking-side-kick Tristan Sheddery, what a stupid bullshit name! Die, Die all of you repulican foul cunt bastards.
Ah well… it really comes as no surprise to me that you fail to distinguish knowledge from belief.
If all the knowledge of humankind was relying solely on Bible, foregoing any invention or difference, we wouldn’t be able to use computers, fly airplanes or more basic things, like pottery, sailing or paper, for these are not explained in the Bible. You’d be still herding goats and sheep to have some for the sacrifice in the temple.
For me, Bible is quite confusing document. The Old Testament is mythology and codex of rites. The New Testament is political implement, as I see it, mostly concerning the Letters. It seems to be a ‘thing’ of Indoeuropeans, that thirst for power, political or otherwise, for you notice little political elements in other religions.
Yes, and the Church is the largest political party in the world (since ~40 AD).
And the final line: I get very annoyed for your ‘American’ attitude. There’s no America anymore, not since 1492. English, French, Spanish, Portuguese and Dutch came, robbed, pillaged and killed for the glory of their former empires and destroyed America. All that is left now is ridiculously small. Plus, US of A is not whole America, just a little bit at the north.
Bless you Brother Shuddery! You explained that so well that I believe even my wife who is frankly rather dumb (no offense dear!) can understand it. Neither of us believes in that scientific gooble-de-gook. The Holy Book gives us all the knowledge we desire or need. We don’t need any liberal scientist nerds explaining ANYTHING to us. “The Big Bang” is something that should only take place on wedding nights (and not until then!) if you ask me. Lord forgive me for that vulgar joke. It has nothing to do with how we were created. For that information we only have to turn to our bibles. You are so right in saying that nothing good comes from ideas that distract people from God’s message. Truer words were never spoken Brother Shuddery. God bless you and all the good Christians on this wonderful website and God bless this great country of ours even if the unholy liberal traitors are doing their best to screw it up!
So lets see “a remarkable degree of irreligiosity, as compared to the populations they came from” is equal to an “evil atheist conspiracy which aims to exclude mainstream Christian viewpoints from the scientific process.”
You’d be hilarious if you weren’t so dangerous
@Jarvis Fernley
Your wife is probably a lot more intelligent than you think. She’s having an affair behind your back claiming her high sex drive and your impotence and your republican beliefs on your sexless marriage. My advice would be to be a little bit more liberal, become a democrat and get a lot more sex in your sad existance of a life, at least then you may get laid and your wife will stop screwing around with that black guy who has a big thick 8 inch prick that she loves so much
Regards
Why science have to be democratic ? You are a scientist if you know science. Prove without the bible that the BigBang theory is false and I will trust you. But I don’t bieleve in bible so you can’t use this argue with me.
@Sam
“Why not get him to post on here? Or is he too afraid of the ?¢‚Ǩ?°?É‚Äû?ɬ?peer review?¢‚Ǩ?°?É‚Äû?ɬ¥ he?¢‚Ǩ?°?É‚Äû?ɬ¥ll get from Jesus Christ?”
Sam, let me know when Jesus will be available, and I will see what I can do. Richard is a busy (and very clever) man, but I think he would be willing to make time for such a momentous occasion. I shall await hearing from you, no doubt the event will take place at a similar time to the Unit arriving on my doorstep.
Well, ain’t you just full of love and compassion for your fellow man!
Tristan, this article makes me weep. Not least of which is the fact that only 90% of Americans are Christians. Every time I see that I know there’s so much more work to be done before America can truly be safe.
Thanks for another great article!
@ Billy Bob (cunt) Neck
You’ll weep when I screw your tight ass, you dumb fuck
I’m sure that kinda language gets you someplace with the type of folks you hang out with but it don’t get you nothing here.
@Simon
You won’t often find me siding with Billy Bob, but he is absolutely right. We can all use lots of swear words when annoyed, it is hardly rational debate though.
Saddam Hussein?¢‚Ǩ?°?É‚Äû?ɬ¥s Islamofascist dictatorship.
Saddam?Ǭ¨?Ǭ•s dictatorship was secular. He and the “islamofascists” (this word is an oxymoron!) hated each other!
As a result, it is producing biased results which are easily disproved by anybody with a basic knowledge of the Bible.
The bible is no proof. It?Ǭ¨?Ǭ•s not even proven to be true itself. (Remember how you failed to prove it?)
Oh, if you want only “christian” science to be existing in your country, just go along. But don?Ǭ¨?Ǭ•t exspect help from outside when you?Ǭ¨?Ǭ•re going back to Medieval fast…
What could be better for science than for it to accept universally acknowledged Biblical truths?
Universally acknowledged by whom?
And Richard is still professor in Oxford. The university doesn?Ǭ¨?Ǭ•t require it?Ǭ¨?Ǭ•s staff to be christian at all.
PS: Science and Scientists are not controled or part of the government.
The Holy Book gives us all the knowledge we desire or need.
Then I hope that you will never drive a car, use a electric device or do something like that. You could unintentionally kill people by doing it.
Not least of which is the fact that only 90% of Americans are Christians.
How does that compare to 30% atheists? And to all the muslims, jews and other religious people in the USA?
The German Guy
IMPEACH BUSH!
@ christophe
I know that lying is second nature to STR, but Richard is still a professor at Oxford, which does not require staff to be Christian…
well the majority of people in the US of A, have finally realized, that the repugnant Republicans, have done nothing but lie… And luckely, and by the guidence of God, they voted Democrat….
And as i told you ( Shelley and clones ), some time ago God told me to be calm, and that he was fed up with all the lies, hate, ignorance, bloodshed and corruption, that the Republicans spread in His ( Gods )name… He said that the reign of the republicans would soon be over, and the world would become a brighter and more peacefull place to live….
God was sad and angry with Bush and his minions. He was sad because mankind still havent learned to co exist, no matter their believes and/or skin colour… And he was angy because his and his sons name constantly are misused by fanatics ( I.e Shelley and clones ), to spread hate instead of love. He was angy because those people tell us ( and they are right about that ), that God is love,…. but still they don?Ǭ¨?Ǭ•t know the meaning of the word…
And my belive in our Lord and saviour has become SOOOO much stronger after the Democrats won….. GOD and his TRUE believers… Kicked A..
@Proud German
Thanks, and it?Ǭ¨?Ǭ•s good to be back :o)
you talk about being open-minded, so BE open-minded! bible may be wrong
[...] Esta ??Ǭ© a minha tradu??É??om ao galego do artigo que referia vai dous posts. Se depois disto alguem pode achegar mostras de que esse blog nom ??Ǭ© umha conha… terei muito medo. [...]
The post is incorrect in every way. It does not reflect the Christian point of view or even accurately represent the bible. Nor is there any correctness in describing atheists. All the statistics are incorrect, all quotes are misquoted, public records are wrong, and details about persons mentioned are incorrect.
There is not one true fact in the entire writing. Absolutely NOBODY could be that stupid. The only other possibility is that it is a joke of some kind.
This is a fake web site if I’ve ever seen one. What a crazy joke. The author of the above post by “Tristan” is no more Christian than I am. This could be a very weak attempt by an atheist to display the absurdities of the bible, and to try to suck in other religious nutters to help confirm.
Either that, or this is a seriously funny web site, worthy of every kind of ridicule.
Wow, and here I am submitting a comment. I wonder, will the true author of this joke please stand up and identify themselves? Please include an explanation. I am curious as to why you would attempt to impersonate a Christian for the purpose of making them look stupid. Don’t they already do that well enough on their own?
Feel free to email me if you don’t want this to be publicly known. The proprietor of this site can give you my email address.
Unbelievable. Simply unbelievable. Coming from an atheist, that’s saying something!
Dear Shelley,
Science can not be split into “science” and “liberal science”. If you knew what words liberal and science actually mean, you would not have made such an error.
Liberal basically means “free”, “broad-minded”, “tolerant”, and “unrestricted”. And, science is basically objective knowlege. Science, to be science, has to incorperate all of these qualities.
i would like to see all the people who believe in liberal scince build their houses on the low lying coasts of the world as a proof of their faith. Maybe in New Orleans.
I hope you realize that ones political affiliation is irrelevant to ones religious beliefs. As I understand it, the Republican party was never created as “the Christian party”. It was originally created with the purpose of the opposition to the push for country wide slavery, fiscal responsibility and opposition to corruption (ironic, considering recent events), modernization of infrastructure and education, and the disbursment of free land to farmers.
I don’t think there is a language that was created with the intent of being against the United States of America (A country where at least half of the worlds known languages are spoken by at least one person). I don’t understand how a dislike of the USA (or more likely, its government’s actions) causes someone to either hate or be hated by a religious figure who spoke mostly of kindness towards others no matter what. (At least according to some interpretations of translations of other translations of non-censored edited texts written up to decades after the events occured…possibly from second and third hand sources). I only mention all of this because I find the admin forum remark of “[comments edited for being in an unAmerican language, hateful to jesus]” somewhat inappropriate, arrogant, and counter-productive to an open and interesting discussion. (Although the same goes for pointless personal attacks. I don’t think anyone is going to be persuaded of anything if you do nothing but question the size of their genitalia.) If the problem is one of the server being unable to handle a certain font, perhaps the message should more accurately reflect that.
Science democratic?? Shall we vote on the laws of physics? I do hope people see this site as comedy, I laugh more when I read this than any other on the web.