STR † THE FREEDOM BLOG

I guess the Billy Bob Express Train To Heaven keeps chugging along.? Mrs. Goodman asked me to write a campaign song so Tristan and I put our heads together and this is what we came up with.? I think it’s a pretty bouncy little number, myself!

God is Love!
BBN

Folks,
I just found this video which I like to share with you.

It just says it all!

Kind regards,
Shelley Goodman

A letter from a friend:

Dear Shelley,

As the founder of Blogs For Bush and GOP Bloggers, I would like to
thank you for joining one or both of growing blogrolls on either blog.

As you may already know, my fellow blogger Mark Noonan and I have
written a book called “Caucus of Corruption: The Truth About The New
Democratic Majority” — in it we expose the corruption in the
Democratic Party that is constantly ignored by the mainstream media.
It is our hope that “Caucus of Corruption” will bring balance to the
debate about corruption in government.

If you haven’t already picked up a copy, you can buy the book online
at the following place:

Amazon.com

BarnesAndNoble.com

The Conservative Book Club

I would also like to bring your attention to some tools we’ve created to help bloggers help us expose the corruption and hypocrisy in the Democratic Party.

If we can hold the Democratic Party accountable for their corruption,
we can see their time as the majority party come to a quick end. I
hope you’ll buy the book, and tell your readers about it.

Thanks!
Matt Margolis
Founder, BlogsForBush.com, GOPBloggers.org

Over 400 members already! Be a good Patriot and let us know where you live!

God bless you,
Shelley Goodman

I wanna start by saying this weren’t my idea, but you can only put up with Mrs. Goodman, Tristan and Sam’s yapping for only so long before you give in.? I ain’t saying I’d accept the nomination, either.? I ain’t saying that at all.

God is Love!
BBN

Once upon a time, Christian music sounded like Christian music.? It had a melody and a good steady cadence so that you could sing it to your child while you were spanking him.? That?s all changed now, thanks to the satanic influence of Rick Warren and the so-called ?emerging church? movement.?? Songs like ?There?s Room At The Cross For You? just ain?t ?hip? enough.? Now you gotta have the rock music and the rap music that claim to be Christian all the while they introduce vile, venal, jungle beats that sends our children into a trance like state that causes them to rut like savages in a world without laws.? Enough is enough!? The only rock that oughta be allowed in church is the rock the church was founded on!? And that?s Jesus!

Briefly Patriotic - The Only Rock

[Note - This article?is reposted?from Blogs For Brownback.? We're trying to get hold of the original author, sisyphus, and get proper permission, but sometimes you read something that smacks you upside the head so hard that your brains get knocked back into the place where they used to be before Madeline Murray O'Hare and the Dummy-Crats poisoned the air of God's righteousness with their secular humanism and sodomy.? I'm expecting the pews to be full on Sunday after y'all read this!]

What?s even worse than the debate raging in American schools about the teaching of the soulless doctrine of evolution, is the non-debate over an issue that rational Americans have foolishly conceded to the secular among us: the issue of Heliocentrism, or the idea that the Earth revolves around the Sun.

Now, it has to be granted that there may be some mathematical evidence going either way; mathematically speaking, Copernicus may be on ground nearly as firm as that of Tycho Brahe. Right-thinking people know the correct doctrine, however:

Heliocentrism is the view that the sun is at the center of the universe. It was proposed by some ancient Greeks,[1] and became the dominant view in the 1700s and 1800s. It was abandoned in the 20th century.

Since the advent of relativity theory in the early 1900s, the laws of physics have been written in covariant equations, meaning that they are equally valid in any frame. Heliocentric and geocentric theories are both used today, depending on which allows more convenient calculations

It seems clear that it may occasionally be convenient to assume that the calculations of Copernicus and Kepler were mathematically sound. However, for both moral and theological reasons, we should always bear in mind that the Earth does not move. If it moved, we would feel it moving. That?s called empiricism, the experience of the senses. Don?t take my word for it, or the evidence of your own senses, Copernicans. There?s also the Word of the Lord:

?He has fixed the earth firm, immovable.? (1 Chronicles 16:30)

?Thou hast fixed the earth immovable and firm ?? (Psalm 93:1)

?Thou didst fix the earth on its foundation so that it never can be shaken.? (Psalm 104:5)

??who made the earth and fashioned it, and himself fixed it fast?? (Isaiah 45:18)

?The sun also ariseth, and the sun goeth down, and hasteth to his place where he arose.? (Ecclesiastes 1:5)

?Then spake Joshua to the LORD in the day when the LORD delivered up the Amorites before the children of Israel, and he said in the sight of Israel, Sun, stand thou still upon Gibeon; and thou, Moon, in the valley of Ajalon. And the sun stood still, and the moon stayed, until the people had avenged themselves upon their enemies. Is not this written in the book of Jasher? So the sun stood still in the midst of heaven, and hasted not to go down about a whole day.? (Joshua 10, 12-13)

Moreover, as Answers in Genesis points out,

?[S]omething well known to high-school physics students, but apparently not to bibliosceptics?that it?s valid to describe motion from any reference frame, although an inertial one usually makes the mathematics simpler.3 But there are many times when the Earth is a convenient reference frame; i.e. at some point we all use the geocentric model in one sense. For instance, a planetarium is a geocentric model. Calculation of rising, transiting, and setting of various celestial objects is calculated geocentrically. There are numerous other examples. Since modern astronomers often use an Earth-centred reference frame, it?s unfair and anti-scientific to criticise the Bible for doing the same.

The premier website for those wishing an absolute debunking of the Biblically unsound, empirically fraudulent, historically heretical doctrine of Heliocentrism is http://www.fixedearth.com/. The website contains numerous links to essays and analyses proving that the embrace of Copernicus is almost as foolish as the embrace of Darwinism. To quote from just one of these astounding essays:

Copernicanism, in short, is a concept that is protected in a bunker under a 50 foot thick ceiling of solid ?scientific? concrete. It is meant to be impregnable. It is a concept that has become ensconced in men?s minds as the indestructible cornerstone of enlightened modern man?s knowledge. Virtually all people everywhere have been taught to believe?and do believe?that this concept is based on objective science and dispassionate secular reasoning, now long since freed from religious superstitions based on the Bible.

Indeed, it was this Copernican heliocentricity concept that gradually broke the back of Bible credibility as the source of Absolute Truth in Christendom. Once the Copernican Revolution had conquered the physical sciences of Astronomy and Physics and put down deep roots in Universities and lower schools everywhere, it was only a matter of time until the Biological sciences launched the Darwinian Revolution.

This embrace of Darwinism then quite predictably emboldened increasingly secular-minded mankind to further reject Biblical Absolutism and replace its teachings with yet more new ?truths? in areas of learning having to do with economics and government. Thus was unsuccessful and floundering Marxism given new life. Marx openly tried to dedicate his own books to Darwin, exulting: ?You have given me the basis for my system?. Thus, the ?Social Science? disciplines were born and began to make their contributions to the destruction of Bible credibility?

Darwin, of course, only popularized evolutionism with his book in 1859, giving it a supposed mechanism thru natural selection and mutations, both since demonstrated to be utter nonsense. The actual roots of the evolutionary concept can be traced back to antiquity?as indeed can the roots of Copernican heliocentricism. Certainly the neo-heliocentrists, i.e., the early Copernicans such as Kepler were evolutionists. Galileo, like Kepler his friend, a neo-heliocentrist, was probably an evolutionist. Newton gave Copernicanism its biggest boost with his book in 1687, but I?ve seen no overt evidence that he was an evolutionist. (If you know of such evidence, I?d like to see it?.)

Thanks, however, to Newton?s invented math and the excesses of his gravitational hypotheses (HERE), Copernicanism dug in its heels in the universities in the 1700?s, and by the last quarter of that century had produced a large crop of hard core heliocentrists, not a few of whom were advocating ape-man theories (amongst them, Darwin?s grandfather, Erasmus Darwin, Voltaire?s disciples in France, etc.). This was the age of ?The Enlightenment? which produced Thomas Paine, the celebrated pamphleteer of the American Revolution, whom George Washington referred to as ?that filthy little atheist?. Thomas Jefferson?s and Ben Franklin?s Deism was commonplace in Europe as well as amongst the rebellious American colonies. During the French Revolution of the 1790?s the Bible was actually outlawed.

These developments were sixty to a hundred years and more before Darwin, but the damage to Bible credibility done by the Copernican Revolution by that time was making an ever-widening open door for Evolutionism to take root. By 1830?even before Darwin (with his Degree in Theology, not Biology) went to the Galapagos Islands and began to formulate his mythology, Charles Lyell (with his degree in Law, not Geology) had advanced his idea of a ?geologic column? with great ages attached to alleged descending layers of the earth. Though such a column has never, ever been confirmed, and though there are mountainous examples of the theoretically old layers being on top of the supposedly more recent ones, and though the Cambrian layer shows a sudden profusion of highly developed life forms with no antecedents, Darwin picked up on Lyell?s fantasy and it is still taught as a proof of an ancient earth and macro-evolutionism.

If that, alone, isn?t enough to convince you of the folly of embracing a soulless, atheistic pseudoscience like Heliocentrism, perhaps this will soften your stony head:

God, thru His Word, teaches a non-moving and immovable earth just as surely as he teaches a six-day Creation 6000 years ago and a universal Flood some 1600 years later. All attempts to twist and even boldly reverse geocentric Scriptures by claiming that God just used a ?language of appearance? are extremely reckless for the Christian devoted to the inerrancy of Scripture. After all, the same argument has been employed with near devastating effect upon the Creationist Movement by Theistic Evolutionists, has it not?

Attacking vulnerable Copernicanism is a strategy that outflanks the entire secular science establishment (overrunning the Theistic Evolutionist?s position in the process!)

In addition to all that, being men and women of sound mind (II Tim. 1:7), Creationists should be eager to learn that:

1) No one?not Copernicus, not Kepler, not Galileo, not Newton, not Einstein?absolutely no one has proven the earth to be moving.

2) The earth moves only thru abstract, abstruse, and esoteric mathematics invented to make it move.

3) Over 200 truly scientific experiments using real mathematics have shown no earth movement, and these had the science establishment in a panic from the 1880?s until Einstein came to the rescue in 1905 with his ?relativity? hypothesis.

4) Relativity is pure claptrap and there isn?t a person reading this who can?t know that fact.

5) Foucault?s Pendulum, the Coriolis Effect, and geostationary satellites do not prove a moving earth.

6) Anyone can see that the results of the Michelson-Morley experiments?especially the light fringe results?prove a stationary earth; and other facts about eclipses, satellite re-positionings, alleged blinding earth speeds, gravitational hooey, etc., add to the proof. Moreover, the Big Bang Baloney, the growing awareness of the effect of Dark Matter on galactic speeds, parallax factors (HERE) which shrink the cosmos, the evidence for speed-of-light retardation, the behavior of reflections and their capabilities for producing phenomena regarding size and depth, etc., all combine to corroborate the certitude of a greatly sanforized universe (one no more than one light day thick: Start HERE), a universe put in diurnal rotation around the spiritual and physical center of God?s Creation, just exactly as it appears to be day in and day out.

7) The Bible not only flatly states scores of times (HERE) and in several ways (HERE) that the earth does not move, it actually has a built-in geocentric assumption?sun rise, sun set?from beginning to end. (One scholar, a geocentrist and mathematician, is cataloguing some 2000 (!) of these.)

In the beginning, the Bible makes clear, the earth was the center of our ?solar? system, with no sun for it to go around until the 4th day of creation (Gen.1:14-19; HERE). At the End we read of a New Earth (HERE) replacing in the same location this old one (Rev. 20:11; 21:1,2). This New Earth which occupies the same location in the cosmos as the old one which has ?fled away? is the place where God the Father and Jesus will dwell with the redeemed forever (Rev. 21:3).

Given that unpreached but clear teaching, do you think that God the Father and Jesus the Son will eternally be somewhere out on the edge of Their NEW Universe in the boonies?or at the center?

If you ask me, that settles the question right there. I support the Bible, and I don?t want my children learning about Heliocentrism in school. I think this doctrine encourages atheism, Darwinism, and anti-Americanism. I don?t want my tax dollars going to finance this kind of false science. It?s complete rot, and I hope that those of us who come to realize this can ultimately prevail against its propogation amongst OUR children with the money from OUR salaries.

I can?t wait to hear from the moonbats and the Darwinists and the other rubes on this one, though. Go on, witch doctors. Preach to me how the planet hurtles through the ether, Scriptural and physical evidence to the contrary! Your false doctrines will be cast down on the day when America rediscovers its Christian roots. That is a promise.

Once again, President Bush cut through the underbrush of confusion with his chainsaw of truth.? Taking time out from his well-deserved vacation from the stresses of dealing with a do-nothing Iraqi parliament, President Bush put this whole non-issue with Alberto Gonzales into its proper and damning context ? ??This is the kind of political theater,? said our Commander in Chief, ?that has caused the American people to lose confidence in how Washington operates.?? And ain?t that the truth!? It?s time for defeato-crats to bring down the curtain on the ?We Hate America Revue? and start rehearsals for a new show? where they accept President Bush?s outstretched hand of compromise.? Maybe they can call it ?We All Resign Immediately?.

Briefly Patriotic - Political Theater

Send fat truth hater Michael Moore to Cuba!

Known-liberal and obviously overweight man Michael Moore is complaining about the US again. This time, he says that he hates America because he broke the law when making his latest lie-filled essay of unAmerican loathing “Sicko” by flying to terrorist state Cuba. Now the authorities are trying to catch up with him, just like they do with every drug pusher, pedophile and muslim-killer and Moore is squealing like a fairy who’s just had his tiara trod on and his gay faced slapped.

Just read these disgusting lies in Moore’s limey propaganda outlet, a pathetic paper that sells less copies than the Virginia Pilot: Hate-filled faggot limey Guardian article.

Now, here’s the intersting thing about that article. Moore and his Goebbels style propoganda minister Harvery (small) Weiner are trying to claim that Cuba is better than the good old USA. Oh yeah? Well, great Michael! If you like it so much, why don’t you go and live there!

Tell you what. If you reckon you’d prefer to stay in Cuba rather than the USA, I’ll even buy your ticket over there and pay to have your stuff shipped out there too. Only if you’ll promise me that you’ll stay there and shut the hell up though!

But when you get the full benefits of life under a mad Communist dictator, let’s see if you don’t start begging to come back to the good old USA!

They say when Moore goes to the bathroom, he causes tsunamis on the other side of the world! You can see why!

That’s why, today at STR.com, we urge the immigration department to emigrate Michael Moore. He doesn’t want us. We certainly don’t want him. As long as you can find a ship heavy enough to carry him, everyone’s happy!

May God bless and keep you all,

Sam Johnston.