STR † THE FREEDOM BLOG

Friends,

We are told that science is neutral and above mere politics, but is it? We all know about the evolution controversy, but is that the only example of liberal researchers abandoning truth and neutrality in favor of discredited wingnut junk science? Sadly not: Modern science text-books are riddled with politically charged left-wing ideology.

The science-books your child reads at school might be exposing your family to the ideas behind the liberal culture of death and idolitary: Materialism. Is it fair to expose our kids to whackadoodle liberal ideas?

Do you know what your family are reading? That science text-book may be loaded with dangerous liberal propaganda. It is your duty as a parent to ensure that easily influenced minds are not distracted by texts that contradict our cherished biblical principles.

Consider the 2nd law of thermodynamics. I’ve always felt that this is one of the most politicized statements in the whole of ’science’. Put simply, the 2nd law states that the amount of chaos (evil) in the universe can only increase. This nihilistic world-view postulates that no matter how much people try to restore God’s order, chaos will win.

Proponents of this bizarre theory anticipate an end-time in which the entire universe has become chaos and God’s order will be destroyed. They call this “Entropy”. This message of destruction stands in stark contrast to the teaching of the Christian Bible, which clearly states that in the post-rapture end times it will be order and not chaos that rules our Universe.

Entropy Death: This is how liberals want our universe to end. We cannot allow this to happen.

The rapture: This message of God’s love and his eventual triumph over the forces of evil and chaos stand in stark contrast to the materialist’s 2nd law of thermodynamics.

Scottish scientist James Clark Maxwell, the inventor of thermodynamics proposed that the only way to practically reduce entropy was by making use of a “demon”. Maxwell, a contemporary of Karl Marx heavily promoted this concept, and “Maxwell’s demon” as we know it today is the first modern attempt to reconcile science with demonology and the occult, a practice explicitly forbidden by biblical teaching.

Why is it that physics text-books refuse to tell both sides of this story? Interestingly enough, even ultra-materialist physicists like Stephen Hawkings claim that the 2nd law does not universally apply. That’s almost like saying that the law of gravitation does not apply during Democratic Party conventions. Either a law is a law or it isn’t. What kind of law can you apply when you feel like it?

Clearly this entire controversy says more about moonbat liberal attitudes to law and order than it says about science. Since liberal science is not rooted in God’s law it lacks moral authority, it can therefore can be used to justify anything from abortion to the heat-destruction of the entire universe.

One thing that astonished me about the liberal reaction to our our recent coverage of Steorn’s remarkable free-energy machine was how many of our readers felt justified to dismiss these claims without having viewed the machine and without taking any time to seriously investigate the scientific claims made by this company.

How is it that our liberal readers feel so justified in dismissing something they have not yet seen? Naturally they claim that this machine violates the secularist 2nd law of thermodynamics, but what about God’s law?

This is just one more illustration of the importance of home-schooling: My granddaughter was never made to attend the liberal lie-factory that is the public-school system. Mrs Shuddery and I have been charged with looking after her education. We shall teach science the way Jesus requires, putting equal emphasis on scientific and biblical principles.

Yours in Christ,

Tristan J. Shuddery