STR † THE FREEDOM BLOG

Friends,

The Democratic strategy is clear - they are undermining our spiritual welfare by bringing some of the world’s most notorious atheists from overseas to “blast” our faith with their overwhelming “reason”. When translated through the multiple layers of Democratic-doublespeak and gobeldygook, this translates as yet another attack on our values - but this time they are going for the very heart of what makes us American: Our spirituality.

The Atheist: He has been conditioned by a secularist society to react with horror to the message of Christ’s love. To him it is blatently ridiculous, and absurd notion to be laughed at, but Jesus will have the last laugh when the atheist is condemned to Satan’s fiery pit of eternal death!

This attack is being lead by malevolent foregin forces, folks like Christopher Hitchins (British), Sam Harris (who acts like a foreigner but is American, if you believe), or the cyber-terrorism advocate Cory Doctorow (Canadian) but worst of all king of the wing-nuts is richard Richard Dawkins who has been rewarded for his most recent assault on American values by being given a new TV series. As usual, the comments on William Dembski’s blog “Overwhelming Evidence” are right on the money:

Richard Dawkins, the self-appointed cop of enlightenment rationality is at it again, his new show on BBC’s Channel 4 is called “The Enemies of Reason” - no he’s not finally come round to our common sense point of view, he’s flailing his blunt atheistic hatchet in ever wider circles, and this time his target is spirituality.

For me, spirituality is one of the most important gifts a human being can have: That ineffable knowledge that something might be out there - our connection with higher-powers, a spiritual realm or even G-d himself. What right does Richard Dawkins have to deny a generation of human beings the comfort of a spiritual life?

That’s right, Dawkins has set his Al-Queda sniper target on the beating heart of American culture, the very thing that makes us different from the infidels, and atheists of Europe - our profound sense of spiritual life, our love of God. But what of Dawkins’ motive for this unprovoked attack on our values? Dembski’s blog again has the answer:

Dawkins is exposed as an angry old man - lacking in spirituality himself he is determined that nobody else should enjoy it. Yet, the world abounds with evidence that clearly contradicts Dawkin’s unfounded assertions. We all know of accounts of people who have seen living phantasms, or communicated telepathically. Dawkins wants you to believe that your spiritual experiences are nothing but bunk, hallucinations. Is this mere provocation, or has militant Dawkins got a dark agenda - trying to convert the world to his brand of atheism?

Once again, militant fundamentalist atheism rears it’s ugly head: Dawkin’s business is more than rejecting the love of Jesus, he is trying to make the world more spiritually ignorant by denying that spiritual phenomena exists. It is precisely this kind of spiritual ignorance that leads the population at large to ignore the malevolent power of pro-witchcraft books like Harry Potter. Could the Atheists therefore be the unwitting stooges of satanists and other forms of occultists? I think so.

Shortly after this meeting with Richard Dawkins, this brave Pastor was tempted by unspeakable liberal sins. Would this man have been exposed to a culture of corruption had it not been for Dawkins? I think not.

For dawkins facts we take for granted, such as the healing power of prayer are reduced to mere co-incidences for his gang of rogue statisticians to analyze and dismiss as irrelivant, but we shall not allow our cherished faith to be dismissed so easily. Once again, Dembski has the answers:

I call upon spiritual people of all backgrounds, whether you are a pagan, Buddhist, Hindu, Moslem, Jew or Christan. It’s time to inform the BBC that our spiritual beliefs are sacred and that British taxpayers should not be funding this of offense to our most cherished beliefs.

Mr Dawkins should be denied the opportunity to speak about matters of which he clearly has no knowledge. If he stopped his angry atheist act just for a moment, then G-d’s spirit might just find a way to enlighten his corrupt soul.

I’m not sure if I can agree 100%. I could only stand near a pagan if I had good reason to suspect that they were not homosexual and a firm guarantee that they would not put the evil-eye or some other gypsy curse on me. Even if the idea is flawed in practice, I do applaud the principle that people of spirituality should band together and demonstrate Dawkns’ atheist ideas for the sheer lunacy that it obviously is.

Yours in Christ,

Tristan J. Shuddery