STR † THE FREEDOM BLOG



Mass-Killing Awareness Week - Stop Abortion TODAY - Stop the AMERICAN HOLOCAUST

Little Brother: A terrorist attack on our teens

Have you noticed that secular book stores have a new section. In between “Kids” and “Adult” there’s a few shelves called “Young Adult”. It’s a whole new way for the liberal minority to project their dangerous ideas onto the most vulnerable section of society: Our teens.

Amazon.com’s leading book reviewer Sharon Winters reviews Cory Doctrow’s latest “Young Adult” novel “Little Brother”, but as you might expect from this notorious pedlar of liberal extremism there’s no brotherly love to be found within the sordid pages of this book:

Cory Doctrow might be famous in some circles as one of the creators of “Boing Boing”, the blog dedicated to pornography, subversion and destroying the American life-style. It’s hardly surprising that for Doctrow’s first published book he has selected a gene just as fantastical as the conspiracy-theory nonsense he writes for his blog: Science Fiction.

Parenting Alert: Corty Doctorow is trying to turn your kids into terrorists. If you do not want your children to end up in Guantanamo bay, please leave negative reviews. It does not matter if you have not read the book yet - we have and trust us, it’s not the sort of thing that any kids should ever read.

The story begins with an all too plausible terrorist attack in San Francisco, which has the far-fetched consequence of turning the government turns into a police state. Now, it doesn’t take a liberal arts degree to realize that Doctrow is really trying to talk about the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center. He’s trying to bamboozle us into believing that President Bush has created a police state in America. Ironically, unless Barrack Obama gets into office, America has no need to fear police repression.

From the very beginning of the book it is clear that Doctrow is intent to cash-in on the horrible attack on American soil in which thousands died for his own cynical, personal profit.

Cory Doctrow: Why does he hate your kids? Why does he despise our sensible conservative values? Why does he hate freedom?

After the terrorist attacks, the protagonist and his associates are taken in custody by the Department of Homeland Security, for questioning. Rather than cooperate with the federal agency charged with protecting America for terrorists, the “heroes” of the book act like wiseacres and fail respond in a sensible way to the agency’s sensible questions. The author celebrates this pointless act of subversion and provides a template for yet more teen-defiance.

I wonder, is the author completely ignorant that we are in the middle of a war on terror? If your town were attacked would you want your kids goofing-around in front of the federal authorities? Apparently Cory  (a father himself) believes that this is acceptable behavior.

When one of the group of kids is detained as a routine precaution, the remaining kids resort to criminal activity in order to recover their friend. Mr. Doctorow (who has long aspired to the hacker lifestyle) has his cast of young-offenders resort to computer-crime in order to attack the legitimate government authorities. The hero hacks in order to get his revenge on the “system”. Yes, the really does encourage treasonous activity, specifically cyber-terrorism - evidently Doctrow believes that any teen with a grudge against society should be allowed to create havoc on the Internet.

I should point out that Mr. Doctrow has no right to claim any knowledge of computer-hacking. He has no IT qualifications. He may have had access to certain privileged documents in order to research this, and by revealing these secrets he may be guilty of releasing restricted government information and may also have made enemies in the computer-crime underground, by revealing his secrets. This may be the first ever book to alienate both the law-enforcement and criminal fraternities at the same time!

At the beginning, I wrote that that this book is for “Young Adults”, which is a new book-marketing term for “Kids”: Mr. Doctrow has begun a marketing scheme to get this unwholesome book into school and public libraries, and yet this book is utterly unsuitable for children:

The dialog is coarse, vulgar, and contains excessive profanity. What is worse is that this book contains graphic descriptions of what the author has described as “realistic” sex. Let me state that again for the record: This book, marketed to kids, sold to kids features kids who engage in under-age sexual activity.

So, just how many topics does leftist author Doctorow exploit in one novel just to make a buck? Terrorism, the 9/11 attacks, computer hackers, The Dead Kennedys, America, himself, and his readers. This book clearly promotes cyber-terrorism against the government by children and all those who support it are guilty by association. Let me put this bluntly: If your kids read this book they will become terrorists, that is exactly what this book is designed to do.

It’s time for responsible parents and Christians to act: Do not buy this book for your children, if you do you are in fact supporting the criminal activity of cyber-terrorism. If you buy this book you are attacking America and supporting Al-Queda. If you see this book in a library I suggest you borrow it and then burn it – it’s the only way to guarantee that it will not fall into impressionable hands.

Sharon Winters
(Amazon.com’s #1 Christian Book Reviewer)

30 Comments so far

  1. me May 27th, 2008 10:20 am

    the book can be downloaded from his site without paying a cent. no need to buy it.

    smelley, once again you’re dumber than shit.

    “If you see this book in a library”
    ..you’re hallucinating.

    educate the youth!

    HAIL ERIS!
    op. smelleyweaselsmell

  2. Sara Carter May 27th, 2008 2:56 pm

    once again shelley bubblebutt repubocrat has deleted my comment again hahahahaha.

  3. jimmygoddard May 27th, 2008 3:51 pm

    Sara, that is exactly the sort of conspiracy theory nonsense that people like you and Cory Doctrow always complain about. The fact is that STR has a zero-censorship policy - people like you do nothing but complain. Why don’t you spend a moment thanking ShelleyTheRepublican for standing up for our Freedom, our tradition and our values.

  4. me May 27th, 2008 5:42 pm

    jimmy g, there were several occasions in which you guys censored comments on this page.

    HAIL ERIS.
    op.sws.

  5. Shelley Goodman May 27th, 2008 5:50 pm

    me,
    I can assure you that your claim is completely made up.
    We never, ever edit any comments whatsoever, period!
    I suspect you base you baseless accusation on the crazy nutjob that calls herself “Sara Carter”. She has very serious emotional problems. Honestly I think she suffers from an slit personality disorder.
    Our lawyers have a restraining order against this psycho by the way. She won’t be bothering us no more!
    Shelley

  6. Random Aussie/ New Zealander May 27th, 2008 6:17 pm

    “President Bush has created a police state in America”

    Not quite, but he’s getting really close.

    “is the author completely ignorant that we are in the middle of a war on terror?”

    Are you too ignorant to realise this is a fictional book?

    “I should point out that Mr. Doctrow has no right to claim any knowledge of computer-hacking. He has no IT qualifications.”

    See above, you don’t need IT qualifications to write a book.

    “If your kids read this book they will become terrorists, that is exactly what this book is designed to do.”

    The book is designed to entertain, nothing more and nothing less.

    “If you buy this book you are attacking America and supporting Al-Queda.”

    Ah the old “supporting Al-Quaeda and attacking America” ploy, tell me, how EXACTLY is buying a book supporting terrorism?

    “STR has a zero-censorship policy”

    HAHAHA! Now pull the other one

    “We never, ever edit any comments whatsoever”

    The other one was just pulled

  7. Sara Carter May 27th, 2008 6:44 pm

    no one’s a bigger nutjob then you shelley. and shelley how are you gonna do that when you do not know my address? and i would like to know when you did? you can’t get a restraining order on somebody on the internet dim wit and people who live in glass houses should’nt throw rocks and don’t try that psychological mind games with me shelley it won’t work hun and i want proof of this restraining order so if you don’t mind give me proof of that please?

  8. Sara Carter May 27th, 2008 6:50 pm

    @jimmy goddard come again there dude did you just say i always complain about? your the last person who should say that hun cause in all the articles i’ve read of yours and the rest of STR you do nothing but complain i find that funny that you say that when you do it. you have no room to talk hun and one more thing jimmy before pointing the finger and say that think before you make accusations like that.

  9. Sara Carter May 27th, 2008 8:33 pm

    @Shelley are you aware that people will use the restraining order commet against you? shelley just by saying that hun people know how to get to you now. and they now know how to push your buttons shelley here’s some advice never say things like that cause people can and probably will use that against you. just trying to help you out here.

  10. Scooter May 27th, 2008 9:16 pm

    Oh snap STR can’t step to Sara. I can tell by the way she PWNS STR that she is a babe.

  11. William Milton May 28th, 2008 8:02 am

    I recall in the 90’s,some pro-Clinton liberals wanted to ban certain books,particularly those in favor of the 2nd Amendment,books critical of the federal government and books about political conspiracies! Books like the pro-2nd Amendment novel “Unintended Consequences” by John Ross,non-fiction like “101 Things To Do Until the Revolution” by Claire Wolfe and “Behold a Pale Horse” by the late William Cooper! Liberals claim to be opposed to censorship but some hypocritically clamor for banning politically incorrect books! Censorship isn’t just a Republican-Right bad idea!

  12. Sara Carter May 28th, 2008 10:23 am

    @Scooter thank you for that compliment that was very nice of you to say. :-)

  13. Steephen McWesterson May 28th, 2008 11:20 am

    It’s very true. Shelley seems to walk herself into conflict like a cumbersome drunk looking for a fight.

    I’m sticking to my idea that she’s just a bored democrat who felt like disgracing the Republican and Christian parties from the inside. I mean, the only picture we have of her is possibly years old. And really, who’s to say that’s even her? Who’s to say she’s a she!? Hermaphrodite! It’s the only logical explanation. People like Jimmy G. are just the REAL Christian nutcases who get caught in his/her scheme.

    Pretty funny when you think about it.

  14. Sara Carter May 28th, 2008 7:02 pm

    @Scooter thank you for that nice comment.

  15. Wraith May 28th, 2008 9:35 pm

    “It does not matter if you have not read the book yet - we have and trust us, it’s not the sort of thing that any kids should ever read.”
    -Please bear in mind that this warning comes from the people that didn’t understand Toy Story, claimed to play GTA IV yet couldn’t pick the main character out of a very small crowd, confused Halflife 2 and Second Life, and believe that they have free reign to distort facts.

    “America has no need to fear police repression.”
    -What was the name of that one act… the one that basically said the American government could watch you, and listen in/record damn near *everything* you do… Didn’t it even say the police could detain you without cause? How is that not repression?

    “I wonder, is the author completely ignorant that we are in the middle of a war on terror?”
    -One that can’t be won…

    “If your town were attacked”
    -Name four American cities that have undergone a full blown terrorist attack in the past three years.

    “Yes, the really does encourage treasonous activity”
    -The United States was founded on treason against Britain.

    “I should point out that Mr. Doctrow has no right to claim any knowledge of computer-hacking”
    -Ah, I see, and you’re one to talk eh? Pot’s not calling the kettle black on this one… not at all… Not like STR claims to run on “Vista Servers” or something stupid like that…

    “The dialog is coarse, vulgar, and contains excessive profanity. What is worse is that this book contains graphic descriptions of what the author has described as “realistic” sex.”
    -Ya know it’s a longshot but I’m willing to assume you probably haven’t even physically seen the book before, let alone read any of it.

    “If you see this book in a library I suggest you borrow it and then burn it”
    -Didn’t STR burn, as in set ablaze, their rented version of Toy Story because they didn’t understand it?

    “The fact is that STR has a zero-censorship policy”
    -Cough, Bullshit!, Cough… STR edits comments left and right, just because you don’t acknowlege it doesn’t mean the peanut gallery doesn’t see it happening.

    -Wraith

  16. Kira May 28th, 2008 11:33 pm

    god, Shelley, you sure are a big slut, I mean, why do you contradict yourself ? in numerous times you have made censorchip with our comments, and you edit your articles.

    And you sure are a big slut whose g spot has yet to be found because your husband is occupied fucking a prostitute because you cant please him, then you made a weird blog where we would make comments and because you are so filthy, our comments turn you on and you masturbate to them

    Sara is a much better woman than you, thats for sure.

  17. Sara Carter May 29th, 2008 1:14 am

    @Kira thank you so much for that comment.

  18. Peter May 29th, 2008 1:38 pm

    Hi - I don`t know him well, this canadian author and his book “Little Boy”, therefore I can`t write much about him and his work. I just know, he is a SF autor and his book Little Brother is critical of society. Yes - he criticizes the US goverment a bit and the effects of the war on terror project.
    We have a high number of books or magazines worldwide, which criticize the US goverment. My friends and relatives in the States told me, the war on terror is actually a controversial policy.
    If I would buy this book I will support the Al Qadia and Bin Laden? I mean, we support them every day….seriously, they have enough money - they don`t need us.
    Bin Laden and his dude Al Zawahiri are very good educated and rich people. They know, how to get money. And there is a lot of money in the Middle East - think to all these Petro-Dollars for instant. They don`t need a book. Secondly - this author don`t supports terrorists. He is criticizing, all over the globe a lot of people criticize the US goverment and they are no terrorists.
    However - all the time Sara Carter was nice to me (what goes around, comes around!) - she was nice to me and gave me lots of compliments!
    Peter Vienna

  19. Mandalore May 29th, 2008 11:50 pm

    @shelley

    Oh,yeah?I remember about 2 months ago,I began experimenting with a new combonation of weed and lsd.
    I did a bunch of pointless shit that day,I started 7 or so different free accounts on Runescape and WoW(all of which I forgot the passwords to),I watched the “survivor Man” episode of the office over and over again trying to find the “green” meaning of it,but the one other meaningless things I did was post all of the lyrics to the hilarious proffessor bros. episode “history lesson prt. 1″,a fucking hilarious song about the awesomeness of John F. Kennedy.I had posted it on God’s Hitlist as Darth Revan(and for some reason I can’t post any more comments as Darth Revan)before this new look and when I tried to find it,your bitchyness removed it.so don’t say you don’t censor comments.

  20. Mandalore May 29th, 2008 11:58 pm

    If you want to see the hilarious series by Brad Neely,click on my name and search “the professor bros.” or “history lesson part 1″.Another funny series by Neely is I am Babycakes.All hilarious shit only at Superdeluxe.com.

    Peace out from Mandalore
    (formorly Darth Revan)

  21. Mandalore May 30th, 2008 12:00 am

    Wait I got the site right this time.

  22. Sara Carter May 30th, 2008 1:07 am

    @Peter you deserve nice comments i’ve never seen you disrespect STR even though they sometimes say mean things to you which is why i have so much respect for you peter.

  23. Random Aussie/ New Zealander June 4th, 2008 2:43 am

    This place is so lonely and deserted all of a sudden *cricket chirping*

  24. Sara Carter June 4th, 2008 5:38 am

    haha Random Aussie/ New Zealander good one rofl XD. wah wah wah lol.

  25. Trey June 8th, 2008 12:50 am

    “…he protagonist and his associates are taken in custody by the Department of Homeland Security, for questioning. Rather than cooperate with the federal agency charged with protecting America for terrorists,…”

    Is this what you really meant to say? That the DHS is charged with protecting America FOR terrorists? Because that is what you said.

    Errors like this one lend to the belief that the author of this blog is horribly under-educated and/or does not care enough about this project to ensure that their views were accurately portrayed.

  26. recommandations pour sites de jeux de hasard…

    arthropods!pedagogy envelop.mettlesome launch gabbing?…

  27. Q July 3rd, 2008 6:55 am

    Oi. Just finished this book and sent it off to my girlfriend,(who I *gasp* have sex with) as I thought it was absolutely brilliant. I’ve also had a copy sent to a local library (isn’t the Internet great?) and am recommending it to all of my friends. The good old US of A is under attack — but it’s not from “those baby-killing liberals” — it’s from the censorship-advocating, religious crazies like yourself who, in your misguided attempt to direct everyone else’s morals, clearly demonstrate your lack there of. Thanks for letting me air my views.
    Q

  28. Bang A. Gong July 31st, 2008 8:45 pm

    Man! I just can’t wait to read the book. If it’s only half as good as the description, I won’t be putting it down till I finish it from cover to cover!

    Thanks for the review!

    Woo hoo!

  29. JesusisLORD August 29th, 2008 2:34 pm

    Commies and Terrorists, if only our AMERICAN CHRISTIAN brothers would unite. I HAVE TO KEEP MY CHILDREN LOCKED UP IN MY BASEMENT TO KEEP AWAY FROM THE ANTI-AMERICANS RUNNING THROUGH THE STREETS RAVAGING OUR BEAUTIFUL COUNTRY. ITS A SHAME MY CHILDREN WILL NEVER SEE DAYLIGHT BECAUSE OF THIS ATROCITY. MAY WE UNITE AND MAKE THE STREETS RED WITH THE BLOOD OF THE SINNERS. PUBLIC LYNCHINGS AND EXECUTIONS ON THE SPOT AND MAYBE MY CHILDREN WILL BE ABLE TO SEE A MORAL JUST GODLY WORLD WORTH LIVING IN. THEY WILL BE 35 & 37 NEXT WEEK, GOD BLESS THEM.

    -J.K.

  30. Bang A. Gong August 30th, 2008 12:57 pm

    JesusisLORD:

    Obviously, because you have been too busy keeping your kids prisioners in your own basement (most likely as sex slaves), you have failed to notice that the “Commies and Terrorists” in this country and perpetrating their crimes in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ. You are one scary and dangerous dude and I wish I could track you down so that I could have the FBI, the local police department and Child Services search your house. In addition to your kids tied up in closets in the basement, being starved to death and sexually abused, who the hells knows what else you have there! Based on your disturbed psyche, I’d say you’re probably John Wayne Gacy/Jeffrey Dahmner/Ted Bundy resurrected in one single really abominable, sick and utterly disturbed person.

    It is the likes of you who have made and continue to make this country the inmoral, unjust world it has become. Take the Buybull off your eyes and look around, dude, all of the horrific crimes in this country today are being commited in the name of god: from killing little girls in their classroom to bombing abortion clinics, the “hand of the lord” is behind it all. If left to your askew devices, you’ll turn us all back to the Dark Ages, those terrifying times when religion reigned supreme.

    If there was a god, I’d say right about now, may god help us all, but there ain’t no god so we have to help ourselves!

Leave a reply






Shelley The Republican : For God, America and George W. Bush