STR † THE FREEDOM BLOG

When was the last time a Republican advocated the almost certain death of the American people?? Don’t the preamble of the Constitution put it right up front - LIFE, liberty and? the pursuit of happiness (within the framework of morality laid out by the Creator)?? See, Republicans wanna protect that.? Republicans want to protect America, Americans and all the things they work so hard to get.? They are pro-life not anti-life.

It weren’t Republicans that put an agent of Osama bin Laden in Congress.? It ain’t Republicans that wanna elect one President of the United States!? It ain’t Republicans that wanna open the borders to every single undesirable person regardless of race, creed or color to come in here and start murdering Americans.? And it most certianly ain’t Republicans,?once the murders get in here,?that wanna give driver’s licenses to ‘em.

?Salga de mi manera! ?Tengo un poco de coca?na a vender a un ni?o peque?o!

That’s Bill Richardson.? And he’s a Dumbo-crat.

Dumbo-crats, like a certian former president, think that if you don’t get caught then you deserve all the benefits of the crime you committed.? Did you sneak across the Mexican border to sell drugs to our school children?? Well, then, you prolly got yourself a pretty nice car with the profits so here’s a driver’s license for you!? Did the useless Canadian government forget to check your passport when you arrived from Iran which allowed you to sneak across the Canadian border with a suitcase full of shoe bombs?? Well, you’re gonna need a driver’s license to get on a plane to use them shoe bombs, right?? One driver’s license coming up!

?
Would Richardson give Osama bin Laden a driver’s license?
Looks like he already did!

Chris Wallace on Fox News Sunday did his best to show Richardson how absolutely lib-tarded he was but that’s like trying to tell Hellery that she’s not that pretty.? She ain’t gonna believe you even when you hold a mirror up to her face and it shatters.? No matter how many times Mr. Wallace pointed out that the 9/11 hijackers used driver’s licenses to get on the planes, Richardson just couldn’t see it.? And what’s worse, he kept saying that it made the public safer.? So, a bunch of towelheads programmed by Osama bin Laden and Saddamn Hussein use driver’s licenses to kill 3000 Americans and that’s Bill Richardson’s definition of safe?

Y’all are gonna forgive me if I disgree strongly with that.

I ain’t a vengeful or hateful person, so instead I’m just gonna say that I hope Bill “OBL” Richardson looks both ways before he crosses the street.

God is Love!
BBN
www.neck08.info

My Fellow Americans,

Can somebody explain to me why our President has not yet used his executive powers backed up by a congressional mandate to declare war on the world’s number one aggressor: Iran.

We all know that a swift, hard war with Iran would be in the best interests of world peace: We could destroy Islamofascism at it’s source. But what fewer people know is that finally resolving the Iran problem once and for all will be great for American industry, and therefore great for the American family.

We the reporters, readers and corporate sponsors of ShelleyTheRepublican.com do hereby declare war on President Amadinijerk, or whatever your name is: We the people of the United States will wipe YOU off the face of the earth, you rotten son of a bitch - and our Christan guns will tear your islamofascist limbs from your body and make you wish you had never decided to mess with the USA.

Liberals often complain that our economy is ’stagnating’ or that our dollar is weak, but what are they doing about it? History teaches us that war can spur on great advances in industry that can propel a nation to greatness. Could we have ever have had a post-war boom without world-war II? Of course not - which is why I urge the president to begin military action against our sworn enemy Iran as soon as possible.

STR.com is part of a growing collective of Conservative, Patriotic and Pro-Family bloggers dedicated to spreading Christianity and Justice to the Islamofascist republic of Iran.

The latest war in Iraq has created great opportunities for great companies such as Boeing, Halliburton, McDonnel-Douglas, Raytheonn and Taser Inc. These companies are becoming wealthy by providing America with the tools that we need to pacify the islamofascists in Iraq. Soon the wealth from these companies will trickle-down and enrich our entire economy.

That’s why war with an easy-win enemy like Iran should be great for American families.

Intellectual property like this great movie is America’s greatest export. America is responsible for thousands of great movies that the world loves. But would anybody buy our movies if the world knew that we allow the axis of evil to push us around? Heck no - that’s why we have to attack now.

Furthermore, there’s another good reason why war would be great for hard-working American businesses: Nobody in the world respects a wimp.

If we attack Iran it would send a message to the world that America is still tough and willing to kick the ass of any evil nation who gets in the way that God has ordained for us.

I think winning against Iran would be the best publicity American business could ever have, after all there’s no success better than victory.

Jimmy K. Goddard
(STR Finance & Business correspondent)

Dear Readers

There are America-haters all around the world. Some of them even live right here, in the good old US of A. Why don?t they just leave? Leave the USA to those who love her? I said it before and I?ll say it again: ?My country, right or wrong! America, love it or leave it?! Go leave us alone, you America-hatin? bastards! We don?t need you! You destroy the great experiment!

One especially disturbing example is Jack Clark, founder of the ?Blast the Right? podcast. He claims to be fair and clear thinking but he actually is hateful and insulting. He claims to be able to teach his listeners to ?kick right-wing butt?. He lost his last remaining shreds of credibility by calling his conservative listeners ?pieces of crap? and regularly refers to Jesus as a liberal, a claim that we debunked on several occasions here on ShelleyTheRepublican.com. As absurd as he sounds, even more absurd is that some people actually believe his filthy lies.

According to unnamed sources Jack is a known criminal in his home district. In 1985 he was charged with assault on a conservative grandmother picketing an abortion clinic during the time when his girlfriend killed their unborn child.

We urge all our readers to confront Jack (contact via his website) and let him know that you don?t appreciate his America-bashing, pro-terrorist activity. We need to get behind the leader in order to win the war on terror. I have no idea why this is so hard to understand for liberals. I guess the final conclusion can only be that liberals want America to lose. They want the terrorists to invade and rule America.

God bless you for taking action.
Shelley N. Goodman, ShelleyPAC

Blast the Right podcast #16: Absurd beyond belief!
http://www.therationalradical.com/audio/16-jesusrightwingoreillyhide.mp3

BIG CREEK, W.Va. ? A young black woman who authorities say was tortured for days at a remote hillside home, sexually assaulted and forced to eat rat droppings was not a random target, the county prosectutor said today. (Source)

Once again the media is judging instead of reporting. The 6 alleged perpetrators of the so called “torture” might be innocent after all. Let us just be honest here. Negroes often have connections to the drug dealers and such people. I believe the Burtons and the Brewsters were just trying to help this young Negro girl.

We all know that if a negro-drug-dealing gang did that to the “victim” she will naturally claim the poor white family did this to here, because she is afraid to tell the truth.

All I know is that Frankie and Bobby Brewster, George Messer, Alisha and Karen Burton, Danny Combs are good, upstanding, God-fearing Christian people. I don’t believe for a second what that black slut is telling us about these good folks! The slut should be locked up for life for lying!!!

God bless you. Please pray for justice to prevail!

Shelley N. Goodman, Iowa City

Friends,

All of Shelley’s staff, including myself are subject to a great deal of misguided criticism. Most of this is plain hateful spite from evil atheists who want nothing more than to undo all the good Jesus is working through our hands, but from time to time we receive questions from fellow Christians, who are in personal danger of straying from God’s path. When we receive these questions we do what we can to point our fellow Christian back to the values that God has ordained for us.

The Homosexuals: Liberal “Christians in name-only” claim that Jesus does not condemn “the gays”, so why should we? The answer is simple - in Christ’s time homosexuality as we know it had not been invented so he would have not needed to speak out against it, trusting that human morality would make such behavior impossible.

One such question came to Shelley last week: A reader who shall remain un-named accused us of mis-representing Christ by “obsessing” on the subject of Homosexuality. He went on to argue that as Christians, surely we should be more concerned by injustice and poverty. I was just about to pen a tract explaining that there would be no poverty and injustice were it not for the sin of Homosexuality, when praise Jesus, who should I hear on the Radio but Crosstalk’s Vic Elaison, one of the most Godly Americans ever.

It just so happened that Vic answered my question for me, so please put down your bibles, and listen to a wiser man than me:

Download:

As my dear friend Billy Bob Neck would say, this caller’s argument has been totally deeee-flated. After a smack-down like this one from Vic, I hope that the caller learns a lesson: I just bet that this caller has understood his mistake and will re-join the ranks of concerned Christians and pro-family Americans who are determined to put an end to this evil of homosexuality.

Yours in Christ,

Tristan

Friends,

Shelley’s recent article “Conquering the Drawbacks of Democracy” certainly divided our readers opinion. The vast majority of conservatives and patriots amongst our readership recognized the persuasive clarity of her argument, most notably from smart a contingent of Sam Brownback supporters also share our sensible desire for continuity in government. At this most critical time in American history, the thing we least need is a reckless president who will upset our finely balanced foreign policy.

Today I’d like to address another infrequently discussed side of the “term limits” problem: We all agree that this is one of the more questionable aspects of our constitution, the notion that no matter how well a President has done he is not entitled to serve more than two consecutive terms of office. That’s great news for terrorists and moonbat progressives who can use the departure of a “lame duck” president as an excuse to thumb their noses and declare victory on America. That’s not good news for hard-working folks like you and me whose wealth depends on political stability.

Bill Clinton, the last year of his presidency shamed every American. This do-nothing President left our economy shattered, and left our armed forces weakened and unable to cope with the terrorist immigrants that he was letting in. George W. Bush has corrected Clinton’s mistakes and built our economy back from the Democrat’s shambles. Hillary Clinton plans to return to how it was under her husband’s dictatorship. Expect high taxes and increased immorality under the new Clinton government, this is the recipe for financial ruin.

It’s a well known fact that political turmoil, can cause what we financial types call “market volatility” - rapid fluctuations in the prices of debt, goods and commodities. In my long experience of stock-market trading, I’ve noticed that volatility often occurs when our nation is unsure of it’s future - for example when terrorists strike, when we feel morally conflicted or worst of all when America is threatened with a change of leadership.

I’ve heard that goofy liberal truther moonbats often blame “rampant market corruption” or “sub-prime mortgages” for the recent negative blips in our financial markets. These fools will tell you that it’s time to buy gold and run for the hills, but as with any claims made by liberals they should be regarded with the deepest of suspicion. The truth is usually the opposite of what they claim.

Max Keiser (pictured above) is Al Jazeera’s finance correspondent. Typical of a member of this terrorist organisation, he now lives in France, a rogue state that has long opposed our war on terror. Even the canucks recognize that Keiser is a untrustworthy troublemaker. Max claims that our economy is “damaged”, but are you really going to believe a man who talks to plastic clowns? Who are you going to believe, rogue reporters like Kaiser or well-known, trusted journalists like Fox News’ Neil Cavuto? Smart investors get their advice from STR.com or Fox.

PS. Check out his goofy website, it’s a hoot.

Today, the Dow is at a record high, and likely to grow now that it has been taken over by News Corp, which means it will be properly managed.

The Bush economy is extremely healthy and delivering unprecedented prosperity to American citizens. Every patriot knows that these are great times, which is why the only people you hear criticizing our economy are America hating ultra-leftists who want your investments to fail so that they can help ferment communist / islamfascist revolution in the USA.

Despite the vitality of the American economy, there is a problem looming: In 2008 the American people will have a chance to elect a new leader. Will the winner be a president who follows in the safe, conservative footsteps of great leaders like Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush, or will the next election herald a new immoral dark age for America?

STR Fact File: According to leading end-times researchers such as Todd Strandberg, founder and compiler of the Rapture Index, volatility in the stock-market may be a sign that the rapture and the time of tribulations are imminent.

According to atheistic investment models proposed by fools such as Max Keiser, when the markets are volatile you should invest in gold, however Biblical investment models teach exactly the opposite: Jesus Christ says that all of the gold in the world cannot guarantee a place in heaven.

You should invest your money wisely, by giving it to Christian charities such as Shelley The Republican’s pro-life fund, or perhaps a donation to a Republican presidential candidate who has promised to uphold Christian values.

What if Hillary Clinton were elected? Would she legislate the kind of immorality that would bring floods and greater harm to America’s infrastructure. Imagine the destructive power of hurricane Katrina and then multiply it ten-fold. That’s how angry God would be after Clinton turns America into a free-for-all for immigration, homosexuality and abortion. Could our insurance markets take a beating from God?

This is something that would strike fear into every rational hedge-fund manager.

STR Fact File: Market Volatility, what does it mean?

Put simply, it means small fluctuations in the prices of things on the market. As you can see, this company SCO Group, inventor of the UNIX operating system, a rival to the out-dated Ubuntu Linux product has recently suffered a small downward fluctuation in it’s price. This could be for many reasons, most likely that God is testing their resolve before a big win that most sensible analysts predict may occur within months. This is a great time to invest in the SCO Group, one of America’s most trusted companies.

There is something we can all do:

• First of all, we need to petition our representatives and senators for an end to the absurd “law” that forces a President out of office before his work is done.
• Secondly, in the event that we are unable to start a grass-roots movment which will correct this constitutional folly, we need to obtain pledges from all Republican candidates that they will uphold the principles of accountability, and rigor of the Bush Presidency. Only that will assure our fragile markets that prosperity can continue.
• Finally, we must never forget to pray for the American people, we pray that they will continue to have the sense to trust George W. Bush and his loyal cabinet of patriots. This will help send a message to all of the candidates about the true meaning of conservatism.

Yours in Christ,

Tristan J. Shuddery

Friends,

Our in-boxes were full of emails from our loyal readers complaining that Billy had not told the truth when we revealed our “exclusive” of the final chapter of J. K. Rowling’s latest Harry Potter book. Having read the book I can confirm that we did not get the final chapter 100% accurate, however our speculation was considerably more accurate than other ultra-liberal sources such as Huffington Post and Slate Magazine. According to our trusted source, the reason for the error is that Rowlings‘ secularist publisher insisted on removing any Christian content from the book at the last minute before publication.

STR was the only web-site able to give you the unadulterated text, exactly as the author intended. I regard this as a major journalistic victory for ShelleyTheRepublican.com, and a victory for Christians who must constantly struggle against a secularizing media, hell-bent on turning our kids into sex-maniacs.

Keep reading STR.com for the truth about Harry Potter and the threat to America from paganism, witchcraft, wica and other forms of satanism.

I’d also like to address another aspect of the Harry Potter controversy. Clearly some people have reasonable grounds to suggest that Harry Potter may be opening our kids to the very real danger of the occult:

Last week our friends at Crosstalk dedicated an entire show to some of the negative aspects of this series, particularly the potential for harm if kids without the spiritual armor of Jesus are allowed to read it. We are very aware of the dangers of exposing kids to occult themes, and naturally we feel that parents who allow their children to read Harry Potter should do so under careful supervision and ensure that it is balanced with a few hours a day memorizing bible verses.

Please take a moment to listen to this audio-presentation on the dangers of Harry Potter:

Download:

However having read the latest book in the potter series, I find it to be an unambiguous endorsement of Republican values such as the need to fight Evil in whatever form it takes: The character of “Lord Voldermort” is based closely on the life of Hillary Clinton. Harry’s personal struggle against Voldemort is clearly intended to resemble the struggle we all suffer against a secular culture of death that denies our spirituality.

Who’s worse? Hillary Clinton or evil-sorcerer Voldemort? In 2008 Americans will have a chance to decide, but clearly J. K. Rowling has used her final as a sobering warning against Defeat-ocrat complacency.

The “Death Eaters”, the heartless gang of killers that supports the evil antagonist is clearly intended to represent the Daily-Kossacs. Rowling portrays these as a heartless gang of magic-wielding thugs, so clearly reminiscent of the hordes of liberal bloggers who are so keen to abuse the Internet (and American invention) to unfairly criticize our Christian leader and undermine our war-effort.

The dishonest journalist “Rita Skeeter” is an unambiguous satire of the mainstream media that has mis-represented our conservative values. Rita’s articles provide a moment of levity, but it’s clear to see where Rowling stands on left-wing abuses of journalistic freedom. She is speaking out against a biased press who like nothing more than to trash the reputations of the real heroes: Christians like George W. Bush and our loyal STR readers.

STR Fact File: Teens who have read the Harry Potter books are 20% more likely to have experimented with psychic or occult phenomena such as ouja-boards or curses. Are your kids communing with the devil via witchcraft?

It’s also worth pointing out that in the final section of the book, we can see that Potter renounces his magic. Lasting peace only comes to him when he puts aside his magical ways and accepts traditional family values, the basis upon which our society is built.

I think we need to take a fair and balanced side to the Harry Potter stories and tell both sides of this controversial issue. Is this book a dangerous slippery pathway to the occult or a ringing endorsement of family-values and our need to remain resolute in the war on terror?

What do you think?

Tristan

PS. If you want to learn more about both-sides of the Harry Potter controversy, please encourage your kids and family to read Shelley The Republican’s research-collection. We are the only site that guarantees completely fair and balanced coverage of this important issue.

Friends,

Will somebody tell me what the heck is going on at RedState? Once one of the America’s finest news-sources, they seem to have swung over to the Rudi McRomney “Republican in name only” model of conservatism. For example at least one red-stater has become so outraged that we Americans have God-given freedom of speech, he decided to take it out on our friends from Blogs4Brownback.

Found on a Pro-Brwonback Site, by Rob Johnston

“If it looks, talks, acts like a RINO then that is all it is. The only difference between Fred Thompson and the other RINOs is that he married a woman half his age who looks like a Vegas streetwalker. In fact, that is probably where he met and married her. Sam Brownback in 2008, not only because he is the most qualified, most Conservative, and a Christian, because his wife doesn?t look like a slut.”

When will Brownback and his supporters be called out for these ridiculous and incessant attacks?

Now, lets ignore for a moment that the comment the red-staters was criticizing was a statement of the plain, honest truth. And lets also skip past the fact that it was a merely comment and not part of the article, and also lets not dwell on the fact that blogs4brownback like our own site operate a no-censorship value.

What I really want to know is how is it that the “red-staters” do not understand that our God-given right of Freedom of Speech is a constitutionally protected, core American value. How come the Red-staters don’t understand that freedom of speech means that sometimes people say un-PC things. Freedom of speech means the freedom to offend. Rather than get all upset about plain-speaking Christians who merely wish to point out that fred Thompson is a lying hypocrite who has lobbied for some of America’s worst abortion-factories.

It’s going to come as a shock to the red-staters that of all the mainstream candidates, only Senator Brownback carries the moral authority on family matters to lead America in what is likely to be the last days of the end-times. I think this disillusioned former red-stater said it best:

I?m starting to suspect that the ?Red? in ?Redstate? has a sinister tinge. Could this ?Redstate? website be a socialist operation, created to make true Christian Republicans look like a bunch of Mayberry clay-eating hicks? I small Hitlery Klinton taint all over ?Redstate??

We at Shelley The Republican’s blog hope the next time Red State reviews Sam Brownback’s, they will take a more objective look at his truly conservative pro-values platform. Red Staters deserve to know what Senator Brownback’s message is, so why not report on that rather than pick over isolated comments that further an agenda can be found on any site with an open comment policy.

Yours in Christ,

Tristan J. Shuddery

Friends,

We are told that science is neutral and above mere politics, but is it? We all know about the evolution controversy, but is that the only example of liberal researchers abandoning truth and neutrality in favor of discredited wingnut junk science? Sadly not: Modern science text-books are riddled with politically charged left-wing ideology.

The science-books your child reads at school might be exposing your family to the ideas behind the liberal culture of death and idolitary: Materialism. Is it fair to expose our kids to whackadoodle liberal ideas?

Do you know what your family are reading? That science text-book may be loaded with dangerous liberal propaganda. It is your duty as a parent to ensure that easily influenced minds are not distracted by texts that contradict our cherished biblical principles.

Consider the 2nd law of thermodynamics. I’ve always felt that this is one of the most politicized statements in the whole of ’science’. Put simply, the 2nd law states that the amount of chaos (evil) in the universe can only increase. This nihilistic world-view postulates that no matter how much people try to restore God’s order, chaos will win.

Proponents of this bizarre theory anticipate an end-time in which the entire universe has become chaos and God’s order will be destroyed. They call this “Entropy”. This message of destruction stands in stark contrast to the teaching of the Christian Bible, which clearly states that in the post-rapture end times it will be order and not chaos that rules our Universe.

Entropy Death: This is how liberals want our universe to end. We cannot allow this to happen.

The rapture: This message of God’s love and his eventual triumph over the forces of evil and chaos stand in stark contrast to the materialist’s 2nd law of thermodynamics.

Scottish scientist James Clark Maxwell, the inventor of thermodynamics proposed that the only way to practically reduce entropy was by making use of a “demon”. Maxwell, a contemporary of Karl Marx heavily promoted this concept, and “Maxwell’s demon” as we know it today is the first modern attempt to reconcile science with demonology and the occult, a practice explicitly forbidden by biblical teaching.

Why is it that physics text-books refuse to tell both sides of this story? Interestingly enough, even ultra-materialist physicists like Stephen Hawkings claim that the 2nd law does not universally apply. That’s almost like saying that the law of gravitation does not apply during Democratic Party conventions. Either a law is a law or it isn’t. What kind of law can you apply when you feel like it?

Clearly this entire controversy says more about moonbat liberal attitudes to law and order than it says about science. Since liberal science is not rooted in God’s law it lacks moral authority, it can therefore can be used to justify anything from abortion to the heat-destruction of the entire universe.

One thing that astonished me about the liberal reaction to our our recent coverage of Steorn’s remarkable free-energy machine was how many of our readers felt justified to dismiss these claims without having viewed the machine and without taking any time to seriously investigate the scientific claims made by this company.

How is it that our liberal readers feel so justified in dismissing something they have not yet seen? Naturally they claim that this machine violates the secularist 2nd law of thermodynamics, but what about God’s law?

This is just one more illustration of the importance of home-schooling: My granddaughter was never made to attend the liberal lie-factory that is the public-school system. Mrs Shuddery and I have been charged with looking after her education. We shall teach science the way Jesus requires, putting equal emphasis on scientific and biblical principles.

Yours in Christ,

Tristan J. Shuddery

Friends,

Last week I told you about an unfortunate incident in which an irresponsible cyclist caused hundreds of dollars worth of damage to my Hummer. I’m sure you can imagine how upset I was, but as always, I allowed the Christian spirit of compassion and forgiveness to guide me. The foolish cyclist had learned his lesson, and that would be end of the matter… or so I thought.

Unfortunately I was wrong, the other day in the post, I received a letter demanding compensation for over $4,000 to cover the cost of replacing a damaged bicycle. The cyclist, a typical New-England liberal claimed that his foreign-made ‘road bicycle’ was made out of carbon, and therefore irreparable and that I was liable for the full extent of his damages. That sounds like a typical liberal extortion scam to me.

Would any sane person ever spend four-thousand dollars on a bicycle? For that amount of money you could get a motorbike, or better still a second hand car or truck? This bike was made in Italy, a country famous for hyper-inflation, rampant homosexuality and shoddy engineering. Is that the best you can get for four thousand?

And just because somebody has no bargain hunting common-sense, does that make me responsible? It hardly seems sensible or fair. Why would anybody buy foreign crap when they could have a fine American product for much less? It just does not make any sense!

So I talked through the whole matter with Shelley, who in a moment of Christ-inspired compassion reminded me of Jesus’s commandment to go the extra mile; Shelly authorized me to use the STR funds to buy this idiot a brand new bike, so that is why I found myself in a bike shop last weekend.

Much to my astonishment, the shop stocked a wide range of bicycles and the most expensive could be bought for less than $300. Each of these bikes were rugged looking rides, made from tough American steel.

As Shelley suggested, I bought the very best of their range; an attractive red bike complete with rugged off-road tyres and spring-loaded front suspension (an optional extra). The bike-shop assistant explained that unlike the wrecked foreign-made bike, this bike could ride off road, was virtually indestructible and and came with a bell on the handle-bar, a great way to warn other road-users about fast-moving cyclists.

I’m no fan of bicycles, but this one has everything, from spring-loaded suspension to a handy parking stand. Why would anybody buy foreign when you can get a fine American design like this for a great price?

So I’ve UPSed the whole thing off to Boston, and I hope that will entirely settle the matte, and set a fine example of Christian generoisty.

Yours in Christ,

Tristan J. Shuddery