STR † THE FREEDOM BLOG

.

Dear Lord,

The American Holocaust is still going on. Abortion is still legal in America. We pray in Jesus’ name that you will find it in your heart to forgive us, O’Lord.

Real American are fighting every day to stop abortion but liberals go on killing your creation every day.

50 Million (50,000,000) Americans have been killed so far.

Please forgive them because they are blinded by liberal hatred against life. Please support us in our war against the American Holocaust.

Amen

****************************************************

Facts about Late Term Abortion

• Late term abortions are legal in most states. “Late Term” means that an abortion can be done up to the moment of birth. This means that a birth is being induced and in the act of birth the baby is being killed.
• Some late term abortions are being done by putting a salt-acid mixture into the baby’s lungs so that the child suffocates.
• In case of a failed late term abortions, means that if the child is BORN ALIVE, the “doctor” will often kill the crying (LIVING) baby. The act of killing is often been done by drowning the struggling child in a bowl of water. Sometimes the baby will be just strangled to death or it’s head is being cut off.
• The remains of the child will be thrown in the trash or the corps will be used for medical testings.

• INFANTICIDE - The following issues have been raised in order to get you to think more critically about infanticide and why infanticide would be an acceptable form of family planning among the majority of pre-industrial societies. It is normal for people in one society to judge the behavior of people in other societies in terms of the moral values of their own society. This is, in fact, the very definition of ethnocentrism. However, many issues can be raised regarding a variety of methods of family planning that place the practice of infanticide within a broader anthropological perspective.

• Most Americans would consider infanticide to be morally wrong. However, infanticide is widely practiced throughout the world. Is infanticide necessarily immoral and, if so, is it universally wrong? By what criteria do we make that determination, and do those criteria distinguish unambiguously between abortion, which is legal in our society, and infanticide which is not, but which is accepted and practiced in other societies?
• Abortion is legal and is accepted by the majority of the American population as morally correct. Why is abortion an acceptable method of family planning in the U.S., but not infanticide? To what extent are we, by accepting abortion and rejecting infanticide, defining one method of terminating a human life as morally acceptable while condemning another form as morally unacceptable? If infanticide is practiced by peoples who do not have access to abortion technology, can they be considered morally wrong for terminating a human life by the best means they have available to them while accepting our method of terminating a life because we possess the technological means to end that life before birth?
• How does the fact that our own society’s stand on both the legality and morality of abortion has changed radically in the past 30 years affect our certainty regarding the immorality of infanticide? Isn’t it quite possible that future generations may come to accept infanticide as a reasonable method of family planning, just as we now accept abortion and increasingly accept euthanasia and doctor-assisted suicide –practices which would have resulted in a doctor’s losing his or her license to practice medicine a mere 10 years ago?
• Steven Pinker, in his article, “Why They Kill Their Newborns”, distinguishes between neonaticide and the killing of older children (filicide). He shows that, while our own society condemns infanticide, we are, in fact, quite tolerant of those who kill newly born children. He reports that of nearly 300 women charged with neonaticide in the U.S., not one spent more than a night in jail. The general population was much more willing to deal leniently, for example, with the Grossberg-Peterson case involving the killing of a newborn than they were with the case of Susan Smith, who killed her two sons: one 14 months old, and the other 3 year old.
• Our notion that infanticide is committed by disturbed individuals is also not supported by research. First of all, women who practice neonaticide generally go on to become loving supportive mothers when they do have and raise children (as do mothers who have had abortions), in contrast to those women who kill older children. Secondly, as Pinker states, “it’s hard to maintain that neonaticide is an illness when we learn that it has been practiced and accepted in most cultures throughout history.” That many societies practice infanticide is clearly illustrated by the articles in the Infanticide packet.
• The acceptance of abortion but not infanticide in the U.S. has been justified on the grounds that a baby is alive while a fetus is not. When does a human life begin? How do we define life? In the article referred to above, Steven Pinker discusses how difficult it is to determine when a human organism becomes a person with a right to life. Conception, birth, the end of the second trimester are all rather arbitrary definition points for when a human organism becomes a person. Viability is also problematic, given that the human infant cannot survive on its own for several years after its birth and that many infants cannot survive at all without medical intervention, to say nothing of large numbers of the elderly. Furthermore, infant viability is a matter of degree and is clearly much less developed in humans than in most other mammals. Given the difficulty of establishing clear objective criteria for when personhood is achieved –in some societies “personhood” is not conferred until well after birth– on what grounds do we claim that one point in the human organism’s development is more valid and objective (i.e., less arbitrary) for establishing “personhood” and, thus, a right to life than any other point? If the definition of “personhood” is largely socially determined, to what extent is the criteria used for defining “personhood” in our own society any more objective and valid than that used in other societies? How does the controversy over when an abortion is acceptably performed in the U.S. affect our understanding of the social basis of our society’s definition of when life begins? What factors determine who is likely to accept Pinker’s definition and who is likely to reject it? How does their stand on the issue reflect their personal interests rather than an objective scientific look at the issue? Furthermore, when we set arbitrary boundaries as our defining points for the beginning of life, to what extent do we inadvertently kill human organisms that develop more quickly than the established norm? Finally, why is “personhood” used to determine when a human organism is alive rather than some less subjective critria? If we don’t use “doghood” or “cathood” to determine when dogs and cats are alive, are we being logically inconsistent to use “personhood” to determine when humans are alive? Is there a uniform, objective biological definition for the beginning of life that can be applied systematically to all living organisms, including dogs, cats and humans?
• Most biology textbooks define life as possessing the following characteristics: Cells, energy, heredity, reproduction and responsiveness to the environment. All living things are composed of cells. Even such microscopic unicellular organisms as bacteria are considered alive. All living things also acquire and use energy to maintain metabolism. All living organisms also possess DNA organized into genes and chromosomes which form the blueprint for how that organism will develop and grow. Similarly, all living organisms are potentially capable of reproduction. Being able to reproduce offspring which share their genetic material, living organisms (unlike non-living matter) are able to cause the transfer of genetic information from one generation to the next. Finally, living organisms are responsive to their environments. That is, they are affected by their environments and attempt to adapt to those environments. Are these characteristics, which are presented as distinguishing living organisms in nearly every biology textbook written, less applicable to a fetus than to a baby or a young child, to an invalid or an octogenarian, or for that matter to any human being? (Would they also apply to both the sperm and the unfertilized egg? The Roman Catholic Church maintains that they do, which is why it opposed artificial birth control.) If so, then on what logical or scientific grounds is it determined that a baby or a child is alive but not a fetus? What does this say about our society’s support of abortion but not infanticide? Is it logically consistent? And if it is not, then why is it so widely accepted?

  The definition of when life begins has changed radically in the U.S. during the past 40 years. To what extent has the definition of when life begins changed because newer definitions serve the changing interests of the individuals or political groups doing the defining? To what extent is the changing definition of life and the recourse to such concepts as “personhood” a function of the pivotal role that the abortion issue plays in American politics? Proponents of abortion in the U.S. refer to abortion as a “right” and challenge any qualification on a woman’s “right to choose”. Any factor that threatens that “right” is vigorously opposed, including mandatory waiting periods and parental notification laws. To what extent might the application of an objective interspecies definition of life to humans in general and to fetuses in particular, also be perceived as a threat by those who want to promote abortion as their “right”? A recent article in The Economist titled “The War That Never Ends” (June 13, 2003) examined the abortion issue in the U.S. at the 25th anniversary of Roe vs. Wade. The article distinguished between the continuing controversy over abortion in the U.S. and its general acceptance in Europe, including in such predominantly Roman Catholic countries as France, Spain and Italy. The article viewed the problem this way.

The shocking truth about Late Term Abortions. This is what abortion “doctors” don’t tell you: A birth is induced, the struggling, crying baby is being ripped from the womb feet first, then a big needle is crushed into the baby’s skull from behind and the brain is being sucked out. The baby will be born dead. The American Holocaust is very well alive!

The battered and ripped apart corpse of an American Citizen. His rights violated, murdered and kicked in the trash. This dead child was found behind an Abortion Mill in St. Paul in 2002. Killed and put in the trash, it’s body still warm. This is what Barrack Obama stands for.

This could have been your brother, your son or your friend. He was killed by heartless liberals that don’t value life. He could have invented a cure for cancer or he could have composed a beautiful symphony. He is one of the 50 Million killed in the American Holocaust.

I am so very very sorry Lord.
Please forgive us.

10 comments

More and more homosexuals are coming forward and claiming to had have anal and oral sex (in that order) with Senator and presidential hopeful Barack Hussein Osama.

Senator Obama yet has to discredit these serious allegations. What we know so far is the following:

Obama admitted to have taken serious drugs on several occasions. How do we know he is clean right now or that he will be in the future? Maybe he just wants to be president so he can buy more drugs!

Apparently Obama had gay sex. Do we want another sex offender in the oval office?

Obama is Anti-Life. How can we elect the child-killer to the highest office?

There are also serious questions regarding Obama’s true allegiance. Will he try to reinstate the slavery for white people? Does Obama believe in God or is he a Muzlim? Will he spend our tax money on his negro homies all over America? Senator Obama has yet to clarify several crucial points. Unless he does we can not allow him to be President.

Personally I have started my praying for Godly justice. I hope God will take him out before he can harm the homeland!

Yours,
Shelley N. Goodman

19 comments

We at Shelley The Republican applaud Mike Huckabee’s attempts to introduce some responsible positive campaigning into Primary season. At least one other mainstream blogger has made a firm commitment to ’speaking no evil’ ? but what do you do when presented by unspeakable evil? What can we say, for example, of Hillary’s latest ‘vote-winning’ idea?

She has decided to incorporate some of the most extreme whackjob eco policies into her already whackadoodle platform. According to a top Hillary aide, she has been studying China’s oppressive ?one child per family? law with a view to how she might implement a similar policy in the USA.China’s draconian policy is the ultimate insult to the family: The penalty for daring to have more then one child is a heavy fine, or more usually compulsory abortion. Hillary will never admit it publicly, but she has obviously been following the pagan communist’s inspiration for much of her political life.

According to our informant, a senior Clinton insider, this policy represents a moderate version compared to her original goal which was to implement compulsory human-recycling, in which families would be encouraged to nominate their old and sick for compulsory recycling. Apparently Hillary quickly realized that that particular policy did not test well, but she still thinks she is onto a winner by making babies illegal.It’s just speculation, but I just be she will try to find a way to bring back on-demand euthanasia, she will not be content with on-demand abortion.

According to radical environmentalists human-beings are the cause of all environmental damage. If we have fewer people, they reason, we will have less environmental damage. They claim that if almost all the human beings in the world can be eliminated then the earth might return to their own twisted vision of eco-paradise. Are you surprised that Hillary buys into this preposterous nonsense? Not if you’ve been watching her for as long as us!Have you ever wondered why it is that liberals like Clinton seem to hate America so much? It’s simply because America is full of people, and people are exactly what liberals hate.

19 comments

Today I want to address one of the most pernicious arguments of the pro-mass murder, pro-infanticide, so-called pro-choice (ie anti-life) brigade.

These whining liberal cohorts of the death doctors and Hillary Clinton voters like to pose what they call ‘moral conundrums’ and ‘rational questions’ to justify their crimes.

Let’s ignore the fact, for now, that there really is no such thing as a moral conundrum, since the answer to everything is laid out plain and simple, straight and clear in a book we Christians know as the Holy Bible. (Remember “Thou Shalt Not Kill?” How much more specific do you want it?!)

Let’s just take on the question they always throw in the face of those trying to save lives outside the death clinics:

“What if the woman who intends to murder her baby was a victim of rape?”

I’m sure every Christian has had to respond to that question at some time in their lives. So today, I want to provide a simple three point guide as to how to take on the atheist sicko who puts it to you:

Let’s address this question point by point, in three easy points:

Point One: Two wrongs don’t make a right. Just because the woman is a bit annoyed that doesn’t mean she has to kill a baby now does it? Did Mary kill Jesus just because God didn’t ask her if she wanted it first?

Point Two: Rape is nothing like as horrific as getting your brains sucked out and finding yourself dead and dumped in a bin. Come on ladies! Get over it already. You turn it into a far worse crime by dwelling on it.

Point Three: How do we know the woman was really raped? So often women like to cry wolf, and get the man in trouble when the fault is really theirs. The first question I think we should all ask in this situation of so-called rape is: “is she a slut?” Invariably, in the case of those intent on killing babies the answer is: yes.

I think that this last point merits further investigation. Women today are such slatterns and temptresses, who can really blame men for reading the signals wrong? Just look at this picture:

What does that picture say to you? With those cum-hither smiles, short skirts and provocative tops there is only one message that these temptresses are giving out: free, easy, no questions asked sex however and whenever you want it, boys.All the same, if a man does accept this explicit invitation, he’s likely to find himself banged up in jail, having to get used to the knowledge that a genocide doctor is going to suck his screaming child out of his erstwhile female friend’s womb.

How is this justice?

And yet, outside of decent Christian communities every woman dresses like that. In Democrat areas that kind of filthy outfit is the most common one there is. And yet! As we all know, it’s Democrats who are always first to cry rape and the first to have their babies murdered.

Isn’t it disgusting?!

Shame on them!

Shame!

Yours In Christ,

Sam Johnston

115 comments

Two or three times a week I get an email from a wise-ass who writes something along these lines:

“If you think abortion is murder, then how come you do not ask for the death penalty for those who carry it out?”

The answer is simple - because that penalty is not severe enough. Abortion is most certainly a form of murder, but let me put it to you this way. Supposing a criminal paid another criminal to perform a “hit” - that is to say in the criminal parlance a “contract killing”. Surely both the person who pulled the trigger and the person who financed the crime are equally culpable? And what if it was not an individual but an entire corrupt organization that did the killing? Surely everybody who profited from that death would be just as guilty of murder? I’m sure you can see where I am heading.

We at STR advice those who picket outside abortion clinics to take details of the names and vehicle registrations of everybody who enters the building. Sooner or later we may be able to give them God’s justice for murdering pre-borns. We are lobbying that this law should be made retro-active so that anybody who has comitted an abortion-murder in the past may face murder charges.

America needs a common-sense Christian answer to the abortion problem. It’s clear that Roe vs Wade was a faulty decision that sparked off the worst holocaust the world has ever seen, and that is why we need a strong penalty against this most hideous of crimes. Unfortunately, most of the perpetrators of abortion-murder are not even arrested for their crimes. Surely we need biblical justice where the penalty for taking a life is loosing your own life. What could be simpler than that?

Plan B - henceforth I shall refer to this as “The Murder Pill” - the pentalty for selling and taking this death-drug should be death. We could shut down this evil death industry in no time at all.

I propose that since abortion is a form of murder, everybody involved including the doctor, the doctor’s management and the mother who has paid for the hit-job on her pre-born be given the death-sentence: preferably by being torn apart by a giant suction hose just like they do to the pre-borns in abortuaries.

Jesus sheds a tear every time an abortion-doctor kills a pre-born. Why wont you do something - JESUS IS CRYING!

I just know that is what God wants us to do.

Jimmy

6 comments

Shelley asked our guest-writer Charles Roast for some comments on the subject of home-schooling which we feel will be helpful for many parents who will soon be blessed with a Child.

Now that you are married, it is your duty to become part of what is perhaps the greatest institution in the known universe: The Family.

As you know, the family isthe heart and soul of this great nation of ours, and as parents it is your primary duty to bring up your child with the gifts of firm discipline and a love of Jesus.

While the lie-beral media are constantly trying to downplay the importance of children and the Christian family? The fact remains it is the Christian children of America who are our future.

Small babies are incredibly intelligent at a far earlier age than liberal scientists ever suspected: even in the womb pre-borns are able to think, feel, touch and have a relationship with Jesus Christ. As a parent you must nurture that relationship - even in the woumb:

I suggest attaching a pair of loud-speakers or some other sound-making device to your wife’s pregnant belly so that your un-born child can enjoy fine Christian music, safely re-assured that it shall never be aborted like the atheists do with all their children.

Babies are ‘tabula rasa’: they are a blank slate upon which new ideas and concepts can be impressed and formed. That is why it is important to fill your child only with good Christian principles - we suggest that children should be given only wholesome entertainment like Veggie Tales.

Babies are not immune to the deceits and lies that people have come to accept as ‘facts’, Filthy lies such as the ?war in Iraq is bad? or ?the War on drugs is a waste of money? or ?humans are descended from monkeys? can corrupt your child.

It is therefore the duty of every parent to shield your children from this kind of influence until they are fully secure in their love of Jesus. Do not allow yoru son or daughter to mix with the children of the unsaved until they too are ready to spread the Gospel.

Before bedtime Children love to be read stories, what could be better than the perfect word of God? I strongly suggest that you read strictly from the King James bible, so that your child will have the gift of God’s word in his infancy - perhaps the greatest gift that any baby could have.

As your child grows up you may be tempted to to allow her to play video games, but is that good for her spiritual development? Certainly not. Most video games are made by pagan foreigners and lack a Christian perspective.

Instead, encourage your children to spend their spare time in quiet contemplation of Jesus’ - each of my children has a book-case full of the King James bible, a selection of apologetic tracts and Christian cartoons like Jack Chick. With all this great entertainment who needs Nintendo? Not my family!

The sick liberal establishment wants your children to go to public school for forced reeducation in the virtues of sodomy, hating Jesus, spitting on the Flag, and cursing the words of wisdom from President Bush. One of the great things about Christian home-schooling is that we can take time to educate our children correctly - our daily lesson plan puts biblical principles first.

Always Right,Charles ?Chuck? Roast III

18 comments

?A?ight, you #)@&U%#*@s, who wanna kill some babies ri? now!? I?se gots some reeeal fine babies who just ready t? bite ?n claw dey selfs to deaf!? Who wanna piece o? dis akSHUN, y?all!?

This picture of a baby after a cage match would
evoke nothing but smiles and chuckles from lie-beral
dumbo-crats.? Christians, however, weep for at the mistreatment
of ALL life.

What the heck?!? Has that vacation gone to old Billy Bob?s head?? Has he been sitting on the beach in between prayer meetings without no sunscreen?? Is he turning into one of them poor pathetic people with nothing better to do then write whatever garbage comes into his head and put it on the Internet?? Well, I hope y?all would know me better than that!? Let?s try that first sentence with one of them words changed.

?A?ight, you #)@&U%#*@s, who wanna kill some dogs? ri? now!? I?se gots some reeeal fine dogs who just ready t? bite ?n claw dey selfs to deaf!? Who wanna piece o? dis acSHUN, y?all!?

Negro football player Michael Vick’s list of “crimes”
somehow never mention his obvious contempt for God.

I hope y?all ain?t drunk so much lie-beral kool-aid that I?m gonna have to spend too much time on this.? The fact is that any dumbo-crat that read that first statement was prolly looking for the closest ATM cuz there?s nothing they like better than dead babies.? So the thought of being able to not only watch babies dying but being able to BET on which one?s gonna win prolly the height of they think ?culture? oughta be.? It?s just another way to boost the growing dead-baby economy that Planned Parenthood and Margaret Sanger?s descendants work so hard to fuel.? They?d think nothing of throwing two pre-borns in a cage match and that?s the truth.? Can?t y?all just hear the homos screaming ?BRING ON THE LIONS!?

But dogs ? oh, my goodness, that different story!? Dogs is ?man?s best friend?.

The folks at Pre-born Eaters Thank America (or whatever PETA stands for) just cannot believe that Michael Vick would be so cruel, mean, evil, heartless and un-new-age as to be so mean to a dumb animal.? Doggies, I guess, is just more cute and cuddly than pre-born child.? You can put bandannas on them and teach them how to catch Frisbees.?

Perhaps if pre-borns could catch frisbees, the ghouls
at PETA might care a little more about them.? But since
it takes several years for a child to master the eye-hand
coordination necessary, they have no problem killing them.

What?s more (and I think this is the whole point) homos and lesbians can have as many dogs as they want cuz moral people know that homos and lesbos should have kids.? I ain?t got much Internet access right now, but I?ll bet that if you looked up all the people that belonged to PETA, you?d find prolly 85-90% actively live against Levitical teaching.? That means that there?re still plenty of places in America where they ain?t allowed to have kids.? So, if you look at it logically, it ain?t no big surprise that don?t care nothing about pre-borns.? It just gets ?em all mad and they gotta go out and buy another dress (homos) or a new wrench (lesbos) to calm down.

The point I?m trying to make is that if Michael Vick had a baby fighting ring instead of a dog fighting ring, he?d probably not only still be playing football (the REAL football) but he?d have some kind of government subsidy and Planned Parenthood would provide the babies.

America, y?all oughta be ashamed of yourselves!

God is Love!
BBN
www.billybobneck.com

40 comments

Greetings in Christ Jesus’ name!

It cannot be re-iterated frequently enough - Crosstalk America is the finest Christian radio show currently broadcasting.? The board mandated some years ago that Crosstalk was required listening and that spot questioning would take place to strictly enforce this policy. ? That I recall, only two or our hundreds of volunteers failed their quizzes.? On both occasions, they pleaded not to be let go claiming that the board was quibbling over “semantics”.? Bluntly, people who use words such as “semantics” to defend themselves have no place at Shelley The Republican.? Also, as I ponder the events, it occurs to me that both converted to Christianity.? There may be a lesson there.

But that is not the point.

On 8/15/07, Mr. Eliason interviewed Matt Trewhella, the founder of Missionaries To The Preborn.? If you have?never heard Pastor Trewhella speak then I cannot recommend that you listen to this show strongly enough.? I defy any person with a soul to come away from this program and continue their mindless and disgusting support of the slaughter of pre-born children.

One can walk through one’s life with the assumptions one holds blithely unaware that a subtle shift in one’s thinking might net a new and powerful idea.? One can never know where such a wind may blow from.? This is one of the gifts God bestows upon those who faithfully read STR and why I consider it an honor to include myself among those whom God guided to aid Shelley Goodman.? The staff of STR constantly strives to examine a problem from every side, divorcing themselves from prejudice and, thereby, allowing God to work through them.? I bring this up to explain how listening to Pastor Trewhella allowed me to open myself fully to God and find a new way to help raise awareness of child pornography.

After Mr. Eliason opened the show to telephone calls from listeners, a gentleman called up to inquire as to how Pastor Trewhella dealt with the childish furor of the pro-baby killer set to the large-format posters graphically depicting the helpless mangled corpses of innocent children dismembered at the bequest of selfish, whorish women who care more about attending rock concerts than human life.? The gentlemen also mentioned that these ghouls frequently whined about the effect such images could produce on small children.?

The following recounting of Pastor Trewhella’s response is here paraphrased

I don’t have any problem with children seeing these signs.? In fact, they need to see them.? I have eleven kids and when they get to be about three years old my wife and I show them pictures of babies cut into pieces by abortionists.? Their first question is - “What happened to the baby?”? You see, they recognize that poor murdered pre-born not as a mass of tissue for what it is - a child.? We explain in an age appropriate way that there are bad and evil men that kill innocent pre-born child, robbing them of the chance to serve God.? Those pre-borns make it into our family prayers at night.? Like I said, I’ve got eleven children and I don’t see any psychological damage done to any of them.

No psychological damage!? Put that in Freud’s pipe and “smoke it”!? He then continues.

As to the others, let me tell you a story that was told to me.? When the Americans liberated the death camps in Germany, they took every man, women and child to see the horrors done in the name of Hitler.? They said they took the men and women to show them the effect of their complacency.? And they showed the children the carnage so that it would never happen again.? This is the reason that people need to see these disturbing images.? They need it shoved right in their face so that they can see for themselves just how horrible the slaughter of pre-borns is.

Praise Christ Jesus!?

I sat in my office chair weeping.? I am not ashamed to admit this.? Anyone with a soul who would not weep at such words will undoubtedly suffer the fires of Hell.? But in my mourning for the sons and daughters cut down before their first breath of the sweet air of God, a voice of comfort and love whispered inside me, “and what of those who live to suffer a Hell on earth?? What will you do for them?”

I instinctively understood the action God expected from me - to use Pastor Trewhella’s methods to end all child pornography.

To that end, the board of STR plans to launch a new front in the battle to save the souls of our most precious resource.? Our initiative will be called Terminate Eroticism Against Boys And Girls.? The plan, modelled after Missionaries to the Pre-born, is to display large-format posters depicting child pornography in all its venal sinfulness.? Our teams will conduct rallies at targeted sites (daycare centers, Catholic “churches”, Disney movies etc) to inform, educate and mobilize citizens to bring a complete and utter cessation to child pornography.? In addition, we are currently producing fully illustrated pamphlet for parents to share with their children ages 3 and up that explains in an appropriate way what child pornography is and how to avoid it by obeying your parents and the protection that God’s love affords them.

As always, any constructive suggestions that might occur to you will be gratefully considered.

We hope that you will be as excited about this as we are.

Newton Wilcox
Board of Directors
www.shelleytherepublican.com

35 comments

Dear Readers,Please read this heartbreaking letter from a murdered baby to her murderous mother. In America we allow 2 millions innocent pre-borns to be brutally murdered by abortion. In some cases even the so called “Partial Birth Abortion” is perfectly legal. In the process of the partial birth abortion the skull of a new born child is cracked open and it’s brain is sucked out. After that the body if the innocent baby-boy or baby-girl is thrown away like a piece of trash. We often complain about the cruel and in-humane medical experiments done by Nazi scientists. We have no right to blame them, because we have thousands of worse offenders right here in the homeland. They are called.. “Abortion Doctors”.

 

 

This is my daughter Lise when she was 7. She thanks me every day that I didn’t abort her when she was a fetus. Thanks to God I had the moral courage to give her life.

*************

Compared to the American Holocaust nothing else matters. What do I care about the so called “Global Warming” as long as our children are butchered by the millions? What do I care about terrorism as long as we allow the American Holocaust to go on like it is?

Please help but a stop to this folks. I urge you to get active and stop the mass killing.

Thanks for your attention and God bless you,

Shelley Goodman (Proud Republican, Mother, Wife and first of all … American)

………………….Dear Mommy,I am in Heaven now, meeting my creator always.
He loves me abundantly.
I so wanted to be your little girl. I don’t quite understand what has happened.
I was so excited when I began realizing my existence.
I was in a dark, yet comfortable place. I saw I had fingers and toes.
I was pretty far along in my developing, yet not near ready to leave my surroundings.
I spent most of my time thinking or sleeping.
Even from my earliest days, I felt a special bonding between you and me.Sometimes I heard you crying and I cried with you. Sometimes you would yell or scream, then cry.
I heard Daddy yelling back.
I was sad, and hoped you would be better soon.
I wondered why you cried so much. One day you cried almost all of the day.
I hurt for you. I couldn’t imagine why you were so unhappy.That same day, the most horrible thing happened.
A very mean monster came into that warm, comfortable place I was in.
I was so scared, I began screaming, but you never once tried to help me.
May be you never heard me.
The monster got closer and closer as I was screaming and screaming,
“Mommy, Mommy, help me please; Mommy, help me.”
Complete terror is all I felt.
I screamed and screamed until I thought I couldn’t anymore.
Then the monster started ripping my arms off.
It hurt so bad; the pain I can never explain.
It didn’t stop. Oh, how I begged it to stop.
I screamed in horror as it ripped my leg off.
Though I was in such complete pain, I was dying.I knew I would never see your face or hear you say how much you love me.
I wanted to make all your tears go away.
I had so many plans to make you happy.
Now I couldn’t; all my dreams were shattered.
Though I was in utter pain and horror, I felt the pain of my heart breaking, above all.
I wanted more than anything to be your daughter.No use now, for I was dying a painful death.
I could only imagine the terrible things that they had done to you.
I wanted to tell you that I love you before I was gone, but I didn’t know the words you could understand. And soon, I no longer had the breath to say them; I was dead.
I felt myself rising. I was being carried by a huge angel into a big beautiful place.
I was still crying, but the physical pain was gone.
The angel took me to God and He blessed me.
He said He loved me, and He was my Father. Then I was happy. I asked Him what the thing was that killed me. He answered, “Abortion.
I am sorry, my child; for I know how it feels.”
I don’t know what abortion is;
I guess that’s the name of the monster who hated my landing on earth as an innocent lovely kid.
I’m writing to say that I love you and to tell you how much I wanted to be your little girl.
I tried very hard to live.
I wanted to live. I had the will, but I couldn’t; the monster was too powerful.
It sucked my arms and legs off and finally got all of me. It was impossible to live.
I just wanted you to know I tried to stay with you.
I didn’t want to die.But, mummy, I am totally happy here in God’s abode and I’ve plenty of friends to play with. Only cheerful faces are visible here. I shall wait here for you to join us. Dear Mommy, God had told me that no SELFISH people should be here! I have no doubt that my mommy was very nice and I will recommend to God for you and loving Daddy. Also, Mommy, please watch out for that abortion monster. Mommy, I love you and I would hate for you to go through the kind of pain I did.Please be careful.

Love,

Your Baby Girl

 

SHAME!

MURDER!

STOP THE MASS MURDER OF THE INNOCENT!

STOP THE LIBERAL AGENDA!

 

 

 

SHAME!

 

 

MURDER!

 

 

STOP THE AMERICAN HOLOCAUST!

(Note: Complaints received, the vagina of this baby-girl has been censored. Thanks for noticing. God bless, Shelley)

 

57 comments

?

[I wanna welcome a guest commentator to Briefly Patriotic, Mr. Sully Kelly from South Boston.? I know Mr. Kelly from for the picket lines at the abortuary on Commonwealth Ave in Boston.? I think his testimony should convince anyone who hears it that abortion is ALWAYS wrong!]

The other day when Billy Bob and I was picketing an abortion clinic, some dyke started spouting off about killing human life being justified in cases of rape or incest.? Since I got some experience in that, Billy Bob asked me to say a couple of words.? It?s crap.? Four years ago, I got my daughter pregnant.? I?m not proud of that.? I?m not going into details but it wasn?t completely my fault.? My bitch-whore ex-wife wanted to murder that precious life but after the cops found crack at her house, she went to jail and shut up.? Nine months later, my daughter and me had a beautiful daughter of our own.? She?s almost four now, she ain?t no retard and God?s loves her.? When I look into her bright blue eyes I get the same feelings of love I do when I look at her mother.? So you can take your exceptions for rape and incest and shove ?em up your ass.? God bless you.

Briefly Patriotic - Refuting Abortion Exceptions

36 comments