STR : THE FREEDOM BLOG

Friends,

You can tell a lot about a man by the kind of car he drives; What does the fact that I drive a hummer say about me? Powerful, strong, rugged and All-American. It’s a great truck, and it’s been a pleasure to own these last few months apart from one unpleasant experience just yesterday…

As I was driving home from our STR.com weekly prayer meeting, a cyclist slammed into my left side, badly scratching the paintwork and leaving bloodstains on one of the mirrors. The dumb cyclist colapsed into a twisted wreck by the road-side. At first I figured I would drive on, after all liberals are better off as road-kill…

… just then Jesus spoke to me: He said “Tristan, remember the parable of the Good Samaritan”. I suppose Jesus wanted me to stick around a little longer to help this poor fool on his way, and perhaps spread some of God’s love.

Like Shelley I also drive a Hummer. It’s a great truck but people always complain that it uses too much gas. The way I see it is that by driving this truck, I’m making a statement that I will not let the Democrats high oil-prices defeat me. America’s gonna keep on truckin’ no matter what the terrorists do. Anybody who rides a cycle has already given in to the terrorists.

Well, the cyclist recovered sooner than I expected, and when he did, boy was he mad. He kept shouting something about not signaling at a left turn, and crying for his wrecked bike. I explained to him that if he had not been there on his stupid bicycle he’d never have got in my way and never been injured., and that he shouldn’t be surprised about his bike breaking - after all it was made in Europe, a land where nothing is ever made right.

He even tore up the Biblical tracts I gave him in a shouting rage as he trudged off to who knows here. I’m sure Jesus loves him, but just then I had a hard time finding any way of understanding this angry liberal city-boy with a death-wish.

It’s just typical of cyclists to blame other road-users for their own failings. I bet he was uninsured as well, another irresponsible liberal who expects all of us taxpayers to pick up the bill.

Are all cyclists like this angry young man? It seems obvious to me, that everywhere you find sedition, anti-American behaviour and fornication you will also find cyclists. There has to be something wrong with the kind of people who like being on two spindly wheels instead of being safe behind the wheel of a truck or family-sized car.

One of the busiest days on the French protest-calendar is the annual naked bike-ride. These French people are protesting… well heck knows. That’s just what these people do.

I’m reliabily informed that this event usually ends in a public homosexual French orgy. The french and their so-called sports disgust me.

There are two main types of cyclist which are common in the USA. The first and most deadly is the “Mountain Biker”. As the name suggests, these are insane cyclists whose idea of fun is to pedal up hills and then speed down them terrorizing everybody in their path. Mountain bikers are famous for their abuse of pot, amphetamines and other banned hallucinogens. Very few mountain bikers survive past the age of 30 because of the extreme hazards of downhill cycling, and the toll taken by a diet of drugs and alcohol.

Most mountain-bikers are reckless and irresponsible; they often speed past pedestrians and livestock without a care about the damage they are doing. I’ve long campaigned for mountain-bikes to be fitted with number-plates, exactly like the ones we have on cars. I’m sure the cyclists would not behave so irresponsibly if they knew that their deeds could be tracked down.

The other type of cycling is called “Road Racing” a preposterous sport which is mainly popular amongst the homosexual community. Most Americans do not regard this as a true sport, because the chief objective is to pose in the absurd skin-tight ‘fashions’. This probably explains why road-cycling is the most popular sport in France. It’s just typical that a degenerate, liberal, godless nation like the French would adopt a sport which involves adult men spending hours staring at each other’s butts!

Are cyclists pedalling the road to hell? They wear tight spandex and shave their legs. This member of Shelley’s prayer team is concerned about their souls, and that is why he is reading to them from the book of Leviticus. What could be better than sharing God’s love?

Is it fair that cyclists should be allowed on the road? Cyclists argue that their vehicles are “energy efficient” and that we should all abandon our trucks and start cycling. This hilarious wingnut proposal sounds like something from an Al Gore eco-terror movie. Why should we Americans sacrifice our way of life because of a liberal eco-panic?

Let me put this in a simple way that even our liberal readers can understand: If you cycle to work then the terrorists have already won. We need to deny them their victory, when you drive a truck you are sending a message to the terrorists that they can never defeat us. You show me a cyclist and I will show you a traitor.

Yours in Christ,

Trista J. Shuddery

80 comments

Folks,
we at ShelleyTheRepublican.com don’t buy into the lies about “global warming” as you know. The courageous talk-show host Glen Beck finally set the record straight. There is no such thing as “Global Warming” or at least it’s not caused by humans.

“Global Warming” was invented by Al Gore to score political points for this run for presidency in 2008. We all know that it’s not gonna work. The American public is much to smart to believe this piece of junk-science.

A recent poll shows that only 13 percent of Congressional Republicans believe the big lie about “Global Warming”. On the other side of the aisle, among the democ-rats 95 percent believe it’s true. This just proves once more that liberals are spine-less idiots with no ability to think for themselves.

Al Gore is not fooling us. No way, Jose!

Thanks for reading,
Shelley Goodman

44 comments

[Note - This article?is reposted?from Blogs For Brownback.? We're trying to get hold of the original author, sisyphus, and get proper permission, but sometimes you read something that smacks you upside the head so hard that your brains get knocked back into the place where they used to be before Madeline Murray O'Hare and the Dummy-Crats poisoned the air of God's righteousness with their secular humanism and sodomy.? I'm expecting the pews to be full on Sunday after y'all read this!]

What?s even worse than the debate raging in American schools about the teaching of the soulless doctrine of evolution, is the non-debate over an issue that rational Americans have foolishly conceded to the secular among us: the issue of Heliocentrism, or the idea that the Earth revolves around the Sun.

Now, it has to be granted that there may be some mathematical evidence going either way; mathematically speaking, Copernicus may be on ground nearly as firm as that of Tycho Brahe. Right-thinking people know the correct doctrine, however:

Heliocentrism is the view that the sun is at the center of the universe. It was proposed by some ancient Greeks,[1] and became the dominant view in the 1700s and 1800s. It was abandoned in the 20th century.

Since the advent of relativity theory in the early 1900s, the laws of physics have been written in covariant equations, meaning that they are equally valid in any frame. Heliocentric and geocentric theories are both used today, depending on which allows more convenient calculations

It seems clear that it may occasionally be convenient to assume that the calculations of Copernicus and Kepler were mathematically sound. However, for both moral and theological reasons, we should always bear in mind that the Earth does not move. If it moved, we would feel it moving. That?s called empiricism, the experience of the senses. Don?t take my word for it, or the evidence of your own senses, Copernicans. There?s also the Word of the Lord:

?He has fixed the earth firm, immovable.? (1 Chronicles 16:30)

?Thou hast fixed the earth immovable and firm ?? (Psalm 93:1)

?Thou didst fix the earth on its foundation so that it never can be shaken.? (Psalm 104:5)

??who made the earth and fashioned it, and himself fixed it fast?? (Isaiah 45:18)

?The sun also ariseth, and the sun goeth down, and hasteth to his place where he arose.? (Ecclesiastes 1:5)

?Then spake Joshua to the LORD in the day when the LORD delivered up the Amorites before the children of Israel, and he said in the sight of Israel, Sun, stand thou still upon Gibeon; and thou, Moon, in the valley of Ajalon. And the sun stood still, and the moon stayed, until the people had avenged themselves upon their enemies. Is not this written in the book of Jasher? So the sun stood still in the midst of heaven, and hasted not to go down about a whole day.? (Joshua 10, 12-13)

Moreover, as Answers in Genesis points out,

?[S]omething well known to high-school physics students, but apparently not to bibliosceptics?that it?s valid to describe motion from any reference frame, although an inertial one usually makes the mathematics simpler.3 But there are many times when the Earth is a convenient reference frame; i.e. at some point we all use the geocentric model in one sense. For instance, a planetarium is a geocentric model. Calculation of rising, transiting, and setting of various celestial objects is calculated geocentrically. There are numerous other examples. Since modern astronomers often use an Earth-centred reference frame, it?s unfair and anti-scientific to criticise the Bible for doing the same.

The premier website for those wishing an absolute debunking of the Biblically unsound, empirically fraudulent, historically heretical doctrine of Heliocentrism is http://www.fixedearth.com/. The website contains numerous links to essays and analyses proving that the embrace of Copernicus is almost as foolish as the embrace of Darwinism. To quote from just one of these astounding essays:

Copernicanism, in short, is a concept that is protected in a bunker under a 50 foot thick ceiling of solid ?scientific? concrete. It is meant to be impregnable. It is a concept that has become ensconced in men?s minds as the indestructible cornerstone of enlightened modern man?s knowledge. Virtually all people everywhere have been taught to believe?and do believe?that this concept is based on objective science and dispassionate secular reasoning, now long since freed from religious superstitions based on the Bible.

Indeed, it was this Copernican heliocentricity concept that gradually broke the back of Bible credibility as the source of Absolute Truth in Christendom. Once the Copernican Revolution had conquered the physical sciences of Astronomy and Physics and put down deep roots in Universities and lower schools everywhere, it was only a matter of time until the Biological sciences launched the Darwinian Revolution.

This embrace of Darwinism then quite predictably emboldened increasingly secular-minded mankind to further reject Biblical Absolutism and replace its teachings with yet more new ?truths? in areas of learning having to do with economics and government. Thus was unsuccessful and floundering Marxism given new life. Marx openly tried to dedicate his own books to Darwin, exulting: ?You have given me the basis for my system?. Thus, the ?Social Science? disciplines were born and began to make their contributions to the destruction of Bible credibility?

Darwin, of course, only popularized evolutionism with his book in 1859, giving it a supposed mechanism thru natural selection and mutations, both since demonstrated to be utter nonsense. The actual roots of the evolutionary concept can be traced back to antiquity?as indeed can the roots of Copernican heliocentricism. Certainly the neo-heliocentrists, i.e., the early Copernicans such as Kepler were evolutionists. Galileo, like Kepler his friend, a neo-heliocentrist, was probably an evolutionist. Newton gave Copernicanism its biggest boost with his book in 1687, but I?ve seen no overt evidence that he was an evolutionist. (If you know of such evidence, I?d like to see it?.)

Thanks, however, to Newton?s invented math and the excesses of his gravitational hypotheses (HERE), Copernicanism dug in its heels in the universities in the 1700?s, and by the last quarter of that century had produced a large crop of hard core heliocentrists, not a few of whom were advocating ape-man theories (amongst them, Darwin?s grandfather, Erasmus Darwin, Voltaire?s disciples in France, etc.). This was the age of ?The Enlightenment? which produced Thomas Paine, the celebrated pamphleteer of the American Revolution, whom George Washington referred to as ?that filthy little atheist?. Thomas Jefferson?s and Ben Franklin?s Deism was commonplace in Europe as well as amongst the rebellious American colonies. During the French Revolution of the 1790?s the Bible was actually outlawed.

These developments were sixty to a hundred years and more before Darwin, but the damage to Bible credibility done by the Copernican Revolution by that time was making an ever-widening open door for Evolutionism to take root. By 1830?even before Darwin (with his Degree in Theology, not Biology) went to the Galapagos Islands and began to formulate his mythology, Charles Lyell (with his degree in Law, not Geology) had advanced his idea of a ?geologic column? with great ages attached to alleged descending layers of the earth. Though such a column has never, ever been confirmed, and though there are mountainous examples of the theoretically old layers being on top of the supposedly more recent ones, and though the Cambrian layer shows a sudden profusion of highly developed life forms with no antecedents, Darwin picked up on Lyell?s fantasy and it is still taught as a proof of an ancient earth and macro-evolutionism.

If that, alone, isn?t enough to convince you of the folly of embracing a soulless, atheistic pseudoscience like Heliocentrism, perhaps this will soften your stony head:

God, thru His Word, teaches a non-moving and immovable earth just as surely as he teaches a six-day Creation 6000 years ago and a universal Flood some 1600 years later. All attempts to twist and even boldly reverse geocentric Scriptures by claiming that God just used a ?language of appearance? are extremely reckless for the Christian devoted to the inerrancy of Scripture. After all, the same argument has been employed with near devastating effect upon the Creationist Movement by Theistic Evolutionists, has it not?

Attacking vulnerable Copernicanism is a strategy that outflanks the entire secular science establishment (overrunning the Theistic Evolutionist?s position in the process!)

In addition to all that, being men and women of sound mind (II Tim. 1:7), Creationists should be eager to learn that:

1) No one?not Copernicus, not Kepler, not Galileo, not Newton, not Einstein?absolutely no one has proven the earth to be moving.

2) The earth moves only thru abstract, abstruse, and esoteric mathematics invented to make it move.

3) Over 200 truly scientific experiments using real mathematics have shown no earth movement, and these had the science establishment in a panic from the 1880?s until Einstein came to the rescue in 1905 with his ?relativity? hypothesis.

4) Relativity is pure claptrap and there isn?t a person reading this who can?t know that fact.

5) Foucault?s Pendulum, the Coriolis Effect, and geostationary satellites do not prove a moving earth.

6) Anyone can see that the results of the Michelson-Morley experiments?especially the light fringe results?prove a stationary earth; and other facts about eclipses, satellite re-positionings, alleged blinding earth speeds, gravitational hooey, etc., add to the proof. Moreover, the Big Bang Baloney, the growing awareness of the effect of Dark Matter on galactic speeds, parallax factors (HERE) which shrink the cosmos, the evidence for speed-of-light retardation, the behavior of reflections and their capabilities for producing phenomena regarding size and depth, etc., all combine to corroborate the certitude of a greatly sanforized universe (one no more than one light day thick: Start HERE), a universe put in diurnal rotation around the spiritual and physical center of God?s Creation, just exactly as it appears to be day in and day out.

7) The Bible not only flatly states scores of times (HERE) and in several ways (HERE) that the earth does not move, it actually has a built-in geocentric assumption?sun rise, sun set?from beginning to end. (One scholar, a geocentrist and mathematician, is cataloguing some 2000 (!) of these.)

In the beginning, the Bible makes clear, the earth was the center of our ?solar? system, with no sun for it to go around until the 4th day of creation (Gen.1:14-19; HERE). At the End we read of a New Earth (HERE) replacing in the same location this old one (Rev. 20:11; 21:1,2). This New Earth which occupies the same location in the cosmos as the old one which has ?fled away? is the place where God the Father and Jesus will dwell with the redeemed forever (Rev. 21:3).

Given that unpreached but clear teaching, do you think that God the Father and Jesus the Son will eternally be somewhere out on the edge of Their NEW Universe in the boonies?or at the center?

If you ask me, that settles the question right there. I support the Bible, and I don?t want my children learning about Heliocentrism in school. I think this doctrine encourages atheism, Darwinism, and anti-Americanism. I don?t want my tax dollars going to finance this kind of false science. It?s complete rot, and I hope that those of us who come to realize this can ultimately prevail against its propogation amongst OUR children with the money from OUR salaries.

I can?t wait to hear from the moonbats and the Darwinists and the other rubes on this one, though. Go on, witch doctors. Preach to me how the planet hurtles through the ether, Scriptural and physical evidence to the contrary! Your false doctrines will be cast down on the day when America rediscovers its Christian roots. That is a promise.

24 comments

You may have noticed that March of this year was particularly hot. As a matter of fact, I understand that it was the hottest March since the beginning of the last century. All of the trees were fully leafed oout and legions of bugs and snakes were crawling around during a time in Arkansas when, on a normal year, we might see a snowflake or two.

This should come as no surprise to any reasonable person. As you know, Daylight Saving Time started almost a month early this year. You would think that memebers of Congress would have considered the warming effect that an extra hour of daylight would have on our climate. Or did they?

perhaps this is another plot by a liberal Congress to make us believe that global warming is a real threat. perhaps next time there should be serious studies performed before Congress passes laws with such far-reaching effects.

Connie M. Meskimen, Hot Springs, AR

16 comments

Dear Friends,

you might remember my daughter Lisa from her previous article about oral sex and other perversions. Like all members of the Goodman family, she is a great writer and modern thinker. Needless to say that she is a devout Christian. This is her school essay about the so called “global warming”. Have fun reading.
Yours,
Shelley Goodman (proud mother, proudly American)

=============

The Big Lie of Global Warming or Global Climate Change, by Lisa Goodman

If you check who is believing in the modern big lie that is global warming you will see that it’s almost exclusively liberals. It’s a well known fact that liberalism is a sickness of the mind just like pedophilia and autism. Liberals are unable to live the good life, like normal Americans can. They can not enjoy the freedom, the wealth and justice the homeland offers to all of us. They have to create a climate of fear and mistrust in order to justify their own paranoia. The latest liberal invention is global warming, which is fake of course. There is no such think. The globe is much to big as to be influenced by us humans and God would never allow it to happen.

Mr. Al (the liar) Gore, explaining the people about “Global Warming” in the snow, only idiots fall for that nonsense!

Let’s take a sober look at the facts:

Fact1- The theory that the whole globe is warming up can easily be proven wrong by real scientists. The well known and very trustworthy “American Policy Center” says:

There is no global warming. Period.

You can’t find a real scientist anywhere in the world who can look you in the eye and, without hesitation, without clarification, without saying, kinda, mighta, sorta, if, and or but…say “yes, global warming is with us.”
…
Because of modern science and improved equipment, a “cooling” trend has been most accurately documented over the past 18 years. Ironically, that’s the same period of time the hysteria has grown over dire warnings of “warming.”

The religion of global warming. Liberals refuse to believe in God, but everybody needs to believe in something. So, liberals choose to believe in the big lie.
Copyright: Republicanvoices.org

Fact2- Last winter he had a very high number of snowfalls in the United States, it was cold and icy. Where is your “Global Warming” now? Why do liberals refuse to see the facts?

Fact3- Who benefits from the global warming hysteria? Liberals do. Al Gore became a millionaire over and over again with his stupid movie The Inconvenient Truth ( http://www.climatecrisis.net/aboutthefilm/ ). The only think inconvenient here is your bald-faced lying, Mr. Gore! Who else benefits from the hysteria? The solar panel industry! Liberals are heavily invented in solar panels and other nonsense. The latest reports say that it would cost TRILLIONS of dollars to solve this so called crisis. If we go that way liberals would become filthy rich!

The big idiot is trying to fool Americans into thinking the world is coming to an end soon. (Copyright unknown)

So, what can we do to show them liberal morons that we are not falling for their lies and deception?

• 1. I tell you what: Drive the biggest SUV you can buy. “May I suggest a Hummer, Sir?”.
• 2. Burn your trash: If you have your own property, nobody can stop you from burning your garbage, it’s cheaper. My dad always burns the old car tires in our garden. It’s a lot of fun, there is a HUGE black cloud above our area afterwards. We all love to laugh about the morons that complain about it.
• 3. Let them know that you know that they are lying: As soon as on of them liberals comes to our house my dad pulls his gun and tells them to get lost.
• 4. Use a cool bumper sticker like: “Global warming is for fags!” I know it’s rude but it will wake up a couple of sleeping liberals that’s for sure.

Burn your trash. All products have been produces with natural ingredients, so why not burn them? How can something that comes from the earth be harmful for the earth? If so, it’s not our fault!
Copyright: Foxnews.com

I hear moaning and complaining and whining about the cold weather and the rain all winter long. Now the same people that claim the weather is warming up complain again because it’s warming up. What’s up with them? You can clearly see that they are crazy.

So, rest assured and live your life like you always did. We have a wonderful and bright future ahead of us. After we won the war on terror there is nothing left to worry about.

Lisa Goodman

36 comments

Liberals like to blame the recent increases in the number of earthquakes, hurricanes and environmental disasters on something they call ?global warming?. This junk science theory has been debunked as thoroughly Bill Clinton?s claims not to have engaged on a Grade 9 on the Richter scale sex-explosion with that woman in the Oval Office (the dirty Democ-rat pervert!).

What I don?t deny, however, is that there are more natural disasters than there ever have been and that this summer has been very hot indeed. The difference is, that I know the real reason for all this dangerous weather. Clearly the storms and floods aren?t caused by some invisible gas that you can?t even smell, as liberals like to claim (because that’s crazy!). The answer is far more simple: God is angry.

Very angry.

Until recently, few commentators have been brave enough to actually come out and say this real truth because of the way the liberals control the media and the shrieks of fag rage that greet anyone brave enough to tell the reality. Given this sorry state of affairs, I really take my hat off to High Desert State Prison Chaplain and True Man of God, Bill Ashmore for publishing the following article:

Isn?t that just great?!

Ashmore then goes on to provide incontrovertible evidence to support his theory:

? April 23, 1992 - Supreme Court hears the abortion case, Planned Parenthood vs. Casey - a 6.3 magnitude earthquake shakes southern California to its Liberal core!
? April 25, 1992 - During a counter protest in Buffalo, NY against Operation Rescue - a 7.1 magnitude earthquake hits California (God knows where to strike!)!
? June 28, 1992 - During filthy Gay Pride Day the fourth and ninth most powerful earthquakes hit California! Take that fags!

That looks pretty conclusive to me. What more proof do you want liberals? It?s clear that God has to change the weather because He?s so disgusted at what He sees in certain parts of this Great Land.

This is what it looks like when you get God mad! Please stop it, Liberal Renegades!

There are two important points I would like to make following on from Ashmore?s smart words.

Point One

He?s right! And to that list of things that annoy God I might also add:

1) Always bitching and moaning about the war in Iraq when it?s so over and Our President declared Mission Accomplished years ago.
2) Listening to Gothic Black Metal music.
3) Voting Democ-rat.
4) Potty-mouthed rapper, Eminem.
5) Fat Liberal truth-hater, Michael Moore.
6) The New York Times.
7) Killing babies before they are even alive or can even think or feel in Liberal extermination plants (aka Abortion Clinics!).
8) The use of foul cuss-words.
9) Taxes on Gasoline.
10) Allowing Muslims.

Eminem and Michael Moore, Hateful to God. Michael Moore is the fat one on the left.

Soon there will be storms everywhere!

Point Two

He?s right! Isn?t that great that someone?s come out and said these things publicly?! Thankyou, Mr Ashmore, Sir! Finally a man brave enough to speak what all true Republicans are thinking.

And isn?t it great that Ashmore?s a prison chaplain?! He literally has a captive audience (ha! ha!) every day to whom he can expound his great teachings. Since most people in prison are stupid and under-educated it?s a perfect opportunity for him to work away at the blank canvases of their minds and send them back out into the world (those that don?t deserve to die anyway) as super-tough fag-hating Men of God. Liberals may call his teachings incitement to homophobia, but I call that doing God?s work.

God. He hates fags. How do we know? The Bible tells us so. And that?s the Word Of God.
This image actually shows Him controlling the weather. Do you still need proof, you foolish liberals?!

Ashmore?s position as a chaplain in a prison and his superb work at re-educating Godless criminals also got me thinking. Wouldn?t it be great to have a similar system to teach all other Liberals good sense too?! I mean, after all, they won?t listen to reason and God?s word as things are at the moment, so why not put them somewhere where they don?t have any choice but to listen sensibly and where aren?t constantly distracted by web pornography and smoking drugs like they are at the moment.

High Desert State Prison: Of course, Liberals won’t be living in such luxury, but I think it gives the general impression of how things will look quite well.

These re-education camps wouldn?t cost a thing as they could be paid for out of the Liberals’ own pockets, diverting the money they would otherwise spend on drinking skinny lattes, ipods and Linux computer programs into something that?s actually useful for American society. They?d even have the added advantage of keeping Liberals away from the ballot box at election times (where they always try and ruin it for everyone!). There would be no fixed term duration for their stay, they would merely have to remain in the camps for as long as it takes for them to stop hating freedom and start loving Jesus (and if they run out of money to pay for their studies, they can do helpful manual labour in their spare time; building roads and things like that.)

Even though this project would be run specifically for the benefit of Liberals, I imagine that, knowing them, they?d moan about it for a bit anyway. Especially since they?d have to do some work and actually think sensibly for a change. In the long run, however, I?m sure they?d thank us. After all, we?d be saving their souls.

Wow! What a great system! Everybody will be happy! And that?s Republicanism! Always coming up with the best solutions, every day.

Yours in God,

STR Chief Weather Correspondent,

Sam Johnston (MA, Cantab (correspondence course), Divine Events)

Images Sources:
Ashmore article: The Lassen County Times
Prison: www.pinnacleone.com/
God: Michaelangelo
Angry weather: www.revlu.com
Eminem: wikipedia
Michael Moore: The BBC

66 comments

-

Al Gore says that he has ‘An Inconvenient Truth’ to tell.

What? You mean like the fact that you LOST the election Al Gore?

I?m sure plenty of my good Christian readers don?t know what I?m talking about, so I?ll explain. I?m sorry to say that Al Gore, not content with filling up our screens with liberal nonsense in the run up to the 2000 elections, has come out from whatever stone he crawled under back then and made a film about so-called ?climate change?. He?s called this propaganda piece ?An Inconvenient Truth? and not surprisingly, all kinds of liberals are going to see it.

More worrying, however, is the fact that some good Christians seem to have watched it too.

To avert the risk of these decent God-fearing people from being taken in by Gore?s fear-mongering nonsense slurry, and in case anyone else is tricked into seeing it, I?ve decided to post an analysis of the film.

Here is a typical still from An inconvenient Truth. What does this mean? Stop trying to baffle us with your junk science, Al Gore!

First of all, let me say that I haven?t seen this movie. I don?t intend to and I urge all my readers to avoid it as well. No doubt whingeing liberals will try and criticize this decision, but I say to them, you don?t need to catch a cancer to know it?s bad for you - and the same goes for drinking up poisonous liberal lies.

And make no mistake. It?s all lies. As I?ve already said, the biggest falsehood in this film is about so-called ‘climate change’. ‘Climate change’ is what the liberals claim is happening to this planet to scare good Christians into voting for them. They say that the world is getting hotter (the junk science technical term for this is ?global warming”) and say that if we don?t do something about it soon we will all be dead because of rising sea levels. They also say that this ?climate change? is caused by pollution. Suspiciously enough, they also claim that this pollution is caused by people living the American way by driving nice cars and not sitting in the dark at night. That’s right: the very way of life that liberals hate!

Al Gore, ugly as well as wrong.

Now the liberals have found a man to champion their campaign of lies and confusion: Al Gore, the man who put the vice into Vice-President (ha! ha! Vice means sinful too, just the right kind of description for Al Gore).

Al Gore, you’ve got a nerve telling us what to do! If we?d wanted you to do that, we?d have voted for you in 2000. As it was, the better man got more votes. So why are you bugging us with your opinions on things that no longer concern you??!!

Phew. Sorry, I always rant when I think about Al Gore too much.

This sick man is so desperate for attention that he?s even been crawling around our brave country giving talks and lectures about this global warming thing that isn?t happening. And small surprise, he?s been saying some pretty insulting stuff.

For instance, Gore blames hurricane Katrina on ‘global warming’. I?m sure Christian readers don?t need me to tell them that this is baloney and that that storm was God?s judgement on New Orleans for all its jazz clubs. But how sickening that Gore will use the loss of thousands of lives for political gain and to push a totally unrelated personal agenda!

New Orleans Jazz: What the devil likes to dance to.

How sickening too that Gore has turned to that stew of corruption, Hollywood to help get his message across and (if the rumors are right) to help launch his campaign to replace our current Mr President when his term of office is over.

Michael Moore. Another Hollwood liberal. Look at how fat he is. Disgusting!

What’s more, the details of Gore?s wacky theories aren?t as important as the motive behind them. Just think about it. How convenient would it be to have an invisible enemy, that no one can see and that can never be stopped in our lifetime? If that were the case, the liberals would be able to ensure that the country would permanently be afraid and on a war-footing. They?d be able to pass all kinds of crazy legislation because of the ?emergency? and anyone that criticized them would be labelled as ?unpatriotic”? and a ?traitor”?.

That?s right! Global warming is just a liberal conspiracy to help the liberals win an election. They?ve seen what happens when good Americans are faced with real threats like Saddam?s Weapons Of Mass Destruction and the crazy beard-men of Islam. They know how the country unites behind the man who pledges to get rid of that danger (thank you Mr President!). And so now they?ve decided to invent an enemy of their own.

Of course, Gore and his cronies can?t bomb SUV drivers like they?d like to, but I?ve learned they want to do something even sneakier. They want to raise taxes. And taxes hurt people far more than bombs ever do.

Are you going to let this mad liberal maniac trick you into voting for him and then pay for the privilege? Me neither. And so I urge you all not to watch his boring film.

May God bless you all,

Sam Johnston

106 comments

I never knew Kenneth Lay, but I new his type; He is one of the patriots that built our great nation. He’s a Christian, and a phlanthropist. He’s a friend to the Presidency and a true American entrepreneur. Ken Lay embodies the pioneering spirit like no other I can name.

Ken Lay: An American patriot, falsely convicted by a misguided liberal legal system. Like Jonah, God may be testing his spirit. (Photo by Washington Post)

No matter what the fancy lawyers say I cannot believe he did all those things of which he has been accused. I know in my gut that he is an innocent man, and a victim of his own defence’s incompetence compounded by a liberal-biased legal system that loves nothing more than to kick a conservative when he is down. I’m sure Ken knows that he is a victim of the same corrupted system that has hounded Oliver North, Tom DeLay, and Karl Rove.

Enron: Another victim of the liberal conspiracy against corporate america. Before America’s enemies shut down this business, it was one of the most profitable, desirable stocks in the nation. Enron was still proftable when it was wrongly closed.

I will allways remember Ken’s sanguine response, following his absurd trial:

“We believe God is in fact in control and indeed he does work all things for good for those who love the Lord.”

These are true words; And perhaps God does indeed have a purpose for our friend Kenneth. Perhaps God is punishing Ken for the sin of pride, for he had much to be proud about: He began life in poverty, but built the 7th most profitable company in American history from nothing. He was an inspiration to thousands of Americans. He brought wealth and much needed energy to a grateful country.

But which of us is free from sin? I truly hope the judge considers this on Sepember 11th 2006, when our dear friend is due to be sentenced for crimes of which he is innocent. Which company will be free to innovate and take risks in the climate of fear that will no doubt come about as a result of this unfortunate conviction? Will this be the fate of American prosperity that scheeming democrats have been planning for so long?

Is God testing Ken Lay? According to the bible, even great prophets must be prepared to face god’s judgement. Even a true patriot and a friend of America may be tested byt god. (Pic by Holy Spirit Interactive )

The darte of Ken’s sentencing reminds us of the greatest crime in our recent history. It may have been five years ago, but to me it still seems like yesterday. While Ken Lay and his company were fighting for America, a group of evil terrorists were planning to destroy the World Trade Centre. Chief amongst those plotters was Osama Bin Laden’s right hand man, the criminal genius Zacharias Mousawi.

Federal prosecuters had ample reason to believe that he was the co-ordinator of the attacks five years ago. When we captured him, we were given the the chance to send a clear signal to the terrorists: By giving Mr Mousawi a death sentence, we could have sent a strong to future terrorsts. There is no greater deterrant than the death penalty. We have lost that opportunity, thanks to the liberal bias legal system. The criminal mastermind has got of with a mere life-sentence.

The criminal genius who planned this tragedy for Osama Bin Laden has escaped with a mere life-sentence. Now the world thinks we are soft on terrorism. This is liberal “justice” gone mad.

Osama Bin Laden inadvertantly proved that Mousawi was a key plotter by trying to divert attention away from the prisoner. What more proof do we need that we had got the right man? Why then can justice not take it’s course? Friends, is there no justice in America?

Are innocent patriots like Ken to be incarserated, while self-confessed mass-murderes like Mr Mousawi are allowed to live in comfort at the tax-payer’s expense? Please sign your comments below if you agree with us. We conservatives demand a pardon for Ken, and the death penalty for evil Moisawi.

We pray that our President will emulate Christ’s forgiveness and grant a pardon for Ken Lay. He has proved himself to be a true friend of the American people. He deserves to be free. ( Pic by Rick Kelley )

The free world demands justice.

God Bless

Tristan J. Shuddery,

(STR.com finance and technology editor)

29 comments

Thank heavens that at least one conservative grass-roots activist group has the courage to speak up against the liberal myth of Global Warming. These days, the liberal pseudo-scientific community run by Internet pornographer and absentee parent Al Gore is quick to shout down anything that disproves the current lberal “orthodoxy”.

The Competitive Enterprise Institute has released a pair of inspirational public service ads, debunking the notion that Carbon Dioxide gas is harmful.

If only the crazy liberal mainstream media would listen to this “still small voice of calm” amongst the mad-scientists braying for attention amongst an increasingly alarmist media. If we were able to have calm and rational facts based discussion then violently anti-American organizations like Greenpeace or Friends of the Earth wouldn’t get so much attention.

Now that we don’t need to worry about global warming, I suggest you pay more attention to Shelley’s lifestyle tips.

Yours in Christ,

Tristan

51 comments