STR † THE FREEDOM BLOG

We got just about 2 weeks to "git ‘er done" and repeal the 22nd amendment to let President Bush win the glorious War On Terror!  Y’all need to download the petition and get everybody to sign it.   And to answer yer question - God’s will is gonna get done but that don’t mean that we should let these lie-berals punch us in the face.  You don’t stand in front of a truck and hope that God’s gonna stop it before it hits ya.

God is Love!
BBN

Dear Friends,

what does Christmas mean to you? What do you know about Christmas? This one day, the 25th of December 0000 changed the world like no other event did. That was the day Jesus invented Christmas by getting born.

The first Christmas ever: Young Mr. Jesus Christ was born. Proud parents and so much hope for the world.

Many false religions try to claim Christmas for themselves, with little to no success. Christmas is a Christian as Apple Pie is American. This one day on the 25th of December 0000 when it was snowing outside and the Christ family was waiting for Maria do drop her valuable load it was very clear that something special was about to happen. It was not only the birth of a very special child it was also the birth of everything that is good, decent and worth living. Without the birth of Jesus no morality would be possible today. Mankind would basically be like the towelheads are today: Just a bunch of dirty, uneducated heathens. Jesus made it all possible: The advantages in science and logic. The love and compassion that Christianity promoted was seen as weakness by other cultures around the world.

But what does Christmas mean today? For children it means gifts most of all, but should we give our children useless crap Made in China? Sure we should. Jesus wants us to be happy and enjoy life. He died on the cross just 32 years and 132 days later just to make sure we are absolved of all sins. Jesus’ unbelievable pain and suffering made sure we can enjoy life. He alone made it all possible. The Jews made him suffer unbelievably and still He did not cry and He did not bend. He was a man like no other. Christmas is a day to celebrate His life and to thank Him for His sacrifice.

Tortured and punished for the sins of mankind. At least the dirty Jews did nail Him to the cross instead to a star of david or whatever they use as symbol of their fake religion!

You need to visit a church in your area and make sure you bring everybody you know. Christmas ain’t Christmas without at least two church visits and at least one generous donation.

I urge you to enjoy Christmas because it very well might be the last we will ever have in this country. I think even the most feeble minded of Liberal will understand by now: Barack Hussein Obama ain’t no Christian. He is a hardcore leftwing, communist, marxist, leninist Muzlim. It’s very possible that he will make Christmas celebration as we know it illegal or change it so much that there won’t be much left of the old beloved traditions we hold so dear. What do I mean by that? He might outlaw to cut down a tree for “environmental” reasons. He might not allow manger scenes because they are not politically correct to have one man, one woman and one child. Rather a manger scene must consist of two lesbians or two sodomites. And he also might just make Christmas illegal because it will be illegal to be a Christian in the future. He will not only open the door for Muzlim terrorist, he will also open the door for the destruction of Christian values this country was founded on.

Let’s celebrate Christ just like Jesus intended.

That is why I urge you to enjoy this Christmas as best as you can. Gas up your Hummer, visit relatives, give generous gifts. Just be American one last Christmas and then get ready for the rapture.

It makes so so sad to see that America will finally be destroyed from within. The wrath of slavery is coming to haunt us. A negro has finally taken power and will punish us for the sins of our forefathers. Oh Lord, why must it end this way?

Friends, let’s pray.

VN:F [1.0.8_357]

please wait…

Rating: 3.9/10 (32 votes cast)

17 comments

Socialist lie-beral defeato-crat atheist homosexual commie Muslims tried to burn down Sarah Palin’s church.  IT DON’T WORK LIKE THAT, SODOMITES! The church ain’t the church - the church is the people in the church that upholds God’s law by keeping marriage between a man and a woman and running the islams outta town!

God is Love!

Friends,

I urge you all to take a look at this sensible and thought-provoking article by my dear friend June Gordon at Republican Faith Chat. She’s just one of millions of values-voters who are disgusted at former General Colin Powell’s betrayal of American values and Christianity:

I once respected this man because he helped kill the Muslim terrorists in Iraq, however he seems to have become liberal in his old age. Why is this man who knows the seriousness of the terrorist threat disparaging the American people’s sensible concerns about Obama’s links with unrepentant terrorist Bill Ayers. Why has this former General become soft on terror? Could he have fallen under the fast-talking jive influence of Barrack Hussein Obama?

How can Colin Powell ignore all of the evidence that proves beyond all doubt that Obama is a Muslim, He seriously expects us to believe that there is nothing wrong with a Muslim president? I can understand why George W. Bush fired this man - he’s clearly lost his mind. So what if this deranged former General is supporting Ho’bama - every other soldier supports former POW John McCain.

Yours in Christ,

Jimmy Goddard

Friends,

Who is Michelle Bachmann? She’s a first-term backbencher from Minneapolis who Jesus told to run for Congress.

She declared herself “a fool for Christ” in 2006 when she announced her candidacy - ever since then the Lord has been guiding her to victory. She is a friend to every Christian and a true conservative: She fights against immigration, and homosexuality. She campaigns for our kids to learn about Intelligent Design. She backed George W. Bush and she supports Sarah Palin today.

Most importantly, she reads Shelley The Republican every day, and she’s just started a one-woman campaign against anti-American attitudes in the center of government.

Watch as CNBC Libtard Chris Mathews seemed stunned by Michelle’s pain-speaking godly common-sense. This brave woman has the courage to root-out liberalism and corruption from our houses of government. When Sarah Palin and John McCain are elected she will be given a chance to serve our country by cleansing the un-churched from high-office.

This brave woman is doing the LORDs work. Jesus has told her to kick the atheists, terrorists and homos out of office. Anybody who opposes her is opposing the will of God and must be crushed.

Yours in Christ,

Jimmy Goddard

Dear Friends,

When it comes to pure fear mongering and hatred against America, nobody is worse than Alex Jones. Jones uses his position as syndicated radio talk show host and his access to the hearts and minds of up to 10 million listeners worldwide to sell cheap junk such as water filters, healing stones and other junk that is supposed to protect them from the evil people that control the planet. It might very well be the biggest con-job ever perpetrated on the American airwaves.

Jones, the maker of movies like “Zeitgeist” and “Loose Change 9/11” claims to fight for the American public and against a so called “New World Order” which he claims is trying to “exterminate 90% of mankind with material support of space aliens”. Unnamed sources confirm that he in fact is laughing about the gullibility of his listenership that keep buying his lies and distortions as well as all kinds of nonsense like storeable foods, magic teddy bears and silver coins. “The stuff I am selling can’t be too stupid that these morons won’t buy it” he is quoted by our sources inside the Alex Jones team. His personal wealth is very substantial after 13 years of on the air fear mongering. He is even going so far as to promoting dangerous hemp products on the air. Even though we all know badly hemp and its users are damaging the American society and we all know how expensive the war on drugs is, he still is promoting the use and sale of hemp on his radio show.

Alex Jones likes to be portrayed as young and hip when all he is, is a rancid old snakeoil salesman!

Perhaps the worst aspect of his daily radio broadcast is the open hatred against the Leader George W. Bush and the American government. I call for the arrest of Alex Jones and all his affiliates for the good of the Homeland. His wild-eyed conspiracy crap is polluting the minds of his listeners every day. This is especially bad when you take into consideration that America is in the midst of a fundamental transaction into a new societal structure using scientific methods of a kind the world has never been seen.

The young Alex Jones stuffing himself at MacDonalds, enjoying the fruits of American labor and ingenuity, yet all he has to offer is fear, stupid conspiracy theories and lies directed at the government. Y’all know me, I am a 100% pro life but this is the best damn argument for abortion I’ve ever heard. Maybe we should consider retroactive abortion in his case.

It is time that we acknowledge threats like this and deal with them accordingly. Human scum like that has to be sorted out of the American society. Today or better even yesterday.

Thanks for reading.
May God continue to bless America.

Shelley N. Goodman, Iowa City

Yours,
Shanique Zambo

A vote for Obama Hussein Bin Laden is a vote for terrorism.

A vote for Obama Hussein Bin Laden is a vote for abortion.

A vote for Obama Hussein Bin Laden is a vote for homosexuality.

This is a great campaign idea to help our fellow white-folk to understand why it’s actually racist to vote for Obama. I’d like to thank some smart Republicans in Clarendon County, Virginia for helping to educate misguided white folk who might betray their race.

If you want to help McCain win in your county, print this out and put it in the mailbox of every white family in your area:

.

Dear Lord,

The American Holocaust is still going on. Abortion is still legal in America. We pray in Jesus’ name that you will find it in your heart to forgive us, O’Lord.

Real American are fighting every day to stop abortion but liberals go on killing your creation every day.

50 Million (50,000,000) Americans have been killed so far.

Please forgive them because they are blinded by liberal hatred against life. Please support us in our war against the American Holocaust.

Amen

Facts about Late Term Abortion

• Late term abortions are legal in most states. “Late Term” means that an abortion can be done up to the moment of birth. This means that a birth is being induced and in the act of birth the baby is being killed.
• Some late term abortions are being done by putting a salt-acid mixture into the baby’s lungs so that the child suffocates.
• In case of a failed late term abortions, means that if the child is BORN ALIVE, the “doctor” will often kill the crying (LIVING) baby. The act of killing is often been done by drowning the struggling child in a bowl of water. Sometimes the baby will be just strangled to death or it’s head is being cut off.
• The remains of the child will be thrown in the trash or the corps will be used for medical testings.

• INFANTICIDE - The following issues have been raised in order to get you to think more critically about infanticide and why infanticide would be an acceptable form of family planning among the majority of pre-industrial societies. It is normal for people in one society to judge the behavior of people in other societies in terms of the moral values of their own society. This is, in fact, the very definition of ethnocentrism. However, many issues can be raised regarding a variety of methods of family planning that place the practice of infanticide within a broader anthropological perspective.

• Most Americans would consider infanticide to be morally wrong. However, infanticide is widely practiced throughout the world. Is infanticide necessarily immoral and, if so, is it universally wrong? By what criteria do we make that determination, and do those criteria distinguish unambiguously between abortion, which is legal in our society, and infanticide which is not, but which is accepted and practiced in other societies?
• Abortion is legal and is accepted by the majority of the American population as morally correct. Why is abortion an acceptable method of family planning in the U.S., but not infanticide? To what extent are we, by accepting abortion and rejecting infanticide, defining one method of terminating a human life as morally acceptable while condemning another form as morally unacceptable? If infanticide is practiced by peoples who do not have access to abortion technology, can they be considered morally wrong for terminating a human life by the best means they have available to them while accepting our method of terminating a life because we possess the technological means to end that life before birth?
• How does the fact that our own society’s stand on both the legality and morality of abortion has changed radically in the past 30 years affect our certainty regarding the immorality of infanticide? Isn’t it quite possible that future generations may come to accept infanticide as a reasonable method of family planning, just as we now accept abortion and increasingly accept euthanasia and doctor-assisted suicide –practices which would have resulted in a doctor’s losing his or her license to practice medicine a mere 10 years ago?
• Steven Pinker, in his article, “Why They Kill Their Newborns”, distinguishes between neonaticide and the killing of older children (filicide). He shows that, while our own society condemns infanticide, we are, in fact, quite tolerant of those who kill newly born children. He reports that of nearly 300 women charged with neonaticide in the U.S., not one spent more than a night in jail. The general population was much more willing to deal leniently, for example, with the Grossberg-Peterson case involving the killing of a newborn than they were with the case of Susan Smith, who killed her two sons: one 14 months old, and the other 3 year old.
• Our notion that infanticide is committed by disturbed individuals is also not supported by research. First of all, women who practice neonaticide generally go on to become loving supportive mothers when they do have and raise children (as do mothers who have had abortions), in contrast to those women who kill older children. Secondly, as Pinker states, “it’s hard to maintain that neonaticide is an illness when we learn that it has been practiced and accepted in most cultures throughout history.” That many societies practice infanticide is clearly illustrated by the articles in the Infanticide packet.
• The acceptance of abortion but not infanticide in the U.S. has been justified on the grounds that a baby is alive while a fetus is not. When does a human life begin? How do we define life? In the article referred to above, Steven Pinker discusses how difficult it is to determine when a human organism becomes a person with a right to life. Conception, birth, the end of the second trimester are all rather arbitrary definition points for when a human organism becomes a person. Viability is also problematic, given that the human infant cannot survive on its own for several years after its birth and that many infants cannot survive at all without medical intervention, to say nothing of large numbers of the elderly. Furthermore, infant viability is a matter of degree and is clearly much less developed in humans than in most other mammals. Given the difficulty of establishing clear objective criteria for when personhood is achieved –in some societies “personhood” is not conferred until well after birth– on what grounds do we claim that one point in the human organism’s development is more valid and objective (i.e., less arbitrary) for establishing “personhood” and, thus, a right to life than any other point? If the definition of “personhood” is largely socially determined, to what extent is the criteria used for defining “personhood” in our own society any more objective and valid than that used in other societies? How does the controversy over when an abortion is acceptably performed in the U.S. affect our understanding of the social basis of our society’s definition of when life begins? What factors determine who is likely to accept Pinker’s definition and who is likely to reject it? How does their stand on the issue reflect their personal interests rather than an objective scientific look at the issue? Furthermore, when we set arbitrary boundaries as our defining points for the beginning of life, to what extent do we inadvertently kill human organisms that develop more quickly than the established norm? Finally, why is “personhood” used to determine when a human organism is alive rather than some less subjective critria? If we don’t use “doghood” or “cathood” to determine when dogs and cats are alive, are we being logically inconsistent to use “personhood” to determine when humans are alive? Is there a uniform, objective biological definition for the beginning of life that can be applied systematically to all living organisms, including dogs, cats and humans?
• Most biology textbooks define life as possessing the following characteristics: Cells, energy, heredity, reproduction and responsiveness to the environment. All living things are composed of cells. Even such microscopic unicellular organisms as bacteria are considered alive. All living things also acquire and use energy to maintain metabolism. All living organisms also possess DNA organized into genes and chromosomes which form the blueprint for how that organism will develop and grow. Similarly, all living organisms are potentially capable of reproduction. Being able to reproduce offspring which share their genetic material, living organisms (unlike non-living matter) are able to cause the transfer of genetic information from one generation to the next. Finally, living organisms are responsive to their environments. That is, they are affected by their environments and attempt to adapt to those environments. Are these characteristics, which are presented as distinguishing living organisms in nearly every biology textbook written, less applicable to a fetus than to a baby or a young child, to an invalid or an octogenarian, or for that matter to any human being? (Would they also apply to both the sperm and the unfertilized egg? The Roman Catholic Church maintains that they do, which is why it opposed artificial birth control.) If so, then on what logical or scientific grounds is it determined that a baby or a child is alive but not a fetus? What does this say about our society’s support of abortion but not infanticide? Is it logically consistent? And if it is not, then why is it so widely accepted?

  The definition of when life begins has changed radically in the U.S. during the past 40 years. To what extent has the definition of when life begins changed because newer definitions serve the changing interests of the individuals or political groups doing the defining? To what extent is the changing definition of life and the recourse to such concepts as “personhood” a function of the pivotal role that the abortion issue plays in American politics? Proponents of abortion in the U.S. refer to abortion as a “right” and challenge any qualification on a woman’s “right to choose”. Any factor that threatens that “right” is vigorously opposed, including mandatory waiting periods and parental notification laws. To what extent might the application of an objective interspecies definition of life to humans in general and to fetuses in particular, also be perceived as a threat by those who want to promote abortion as their “right”? A recent article in The Economist titled “The War That Never Ends” (June 13, 2003) examined the abortion issue in the U.S. at the 25th anniversary of Roe vs. Wade. The article distinguished between the continuing controversy over abortion in the U.S. and its general acceptance in Europe, including in such predominantly Roman Catholic countries as France, Spain and Italy. The article viewed the problem this way.

It’s time we all get behind Sarah Palin. She is a strong and proud Christian mother, a patriotic American lady, a brave fighter for what is right and true. She deserves our support.

ShelleyPAC just donated $1,000 to the McCain/Palin campaign and I urge you to do the same. Give whatever you can give. America needs the strong leadership only Palin/McCain can give. Don’t vote for the baby-killin’ negro!

A reason for this incredible Palin-hype (just everybody loves her) might be the fact that she has astonishing similarities to my biggest hero, America’s favorite TV-Character “Peggy Hill“. I said it before and I say it again: All good things come either from Texas, Iowa, well and Alaska I guess! Mike Judge was born and raised in Austin, Texas. He is a fine filmmaker who is portraying the perfect American family in his TV-Series “King of the Hill“. The strong and proud Mother of the Hill family is Peggy Hill. Her charm and wisdom always saves the day, just like Sarah Palins wisdom and charm will be saving America and preserve our leadership in the world. The mighty US of A was, is and will be the only true superpower left on the planet.

Thanks for reading,
Shelley N. Goodman

PS: And yes, as some of you remarked in the past, I, too like a little like Peggy Hill and I’m damn proud of it!

Just a quick reminder to all our faithful readers:

Y’all need to head over to AFA.NET, the second most valuable website on the internets.

Whatever you need to do to please the Lord you’ll find everything you need there:

Fight Homosexuality, register to vote, send a prayer request and much more.

God bless,
Shelley N. Goodman